Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Light from Light

Light from Light is a movie starring Marin Ireland, Jim Gaffigan, and Josh Wiggins. A single mom and part-time paranormal investigator is asked to look into a possible "haunting" at a widower's farmhouse in East Tennessee.

Genres
Drama
Director
Paul Harrill
Starring
Jim Gaffigan, Marin Ireland, Josh Wiggins, Atheena Frizzell

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama
Director Paul Harrill
Writer Paul Harrill
Stars Jim Gaffigan, Marin Ireland, Josh Wiggins, Atheena Frizzell
Country USA
Runtime 1 h 22 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description A single mom and part-time paranormal investigator is asked to look into a possible "haunting" at a widower's farmhouse in East Tennessee.

Top reviews

Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 12:26

The setting is a one night stay in a hotel in an English countryside. While in the hotel, the two men, Ned (Mark Rylance) and Jack (Colin Firth) discover a previously unseen death in a local church. Then a strange video is discovered by Jack, which changes his life forever. The video was played to the people at the hotel. As it was playing, a child named Frank (Ciaran Hinds) appeared. He then kills his father and wife. It is thought that the girl Frank killed was the daughter of the church priest. Jack and Ned want to help him find the truth about the video and keep him from killing again. While Jack and Ned are there, the two men discover a mysterious wooden doll that turns out to be a zombie. Ned wants to use the doll to get rid of the girl Frank. Meanwhile Jack tries to protect Frank from the zombies. Will they succeed in stopping Frank and bring him to the church? This is a very interesting and well made British horror movie. I have to say that the movie is an improvement over the same old horror movie that we have been seeing lately. I really enjoyed the whole movie and I really liked the storyline. The story is simple and the movie is about a guy trying to protect his daughter from a zombie. I thought it was a good movie with good special effects and I liked the setting. It is not a movie that you can go and rent and watch. It is a movie that you have to buy and watch. This is a movie that you have to watch, just like the other horror movies that are coming out. This movie is worth watching, but you have to see it once. If you have seen it, you will enjoy it. If you have not seen it, you will enjoy it.
Wednesday, 24 Jun 2020 21:40

When I first heard that a director would be making a documentary about the creation of American (and most other) films, I immediately thought "well, I'm a film director, I can do this." And that's exactly what I did. I interviewed people from all over the country about their experiences with film and their thoughts on what it means to be a filmmaker. From the end of the documentary, I realized that there are several aspects of filmmaking that are very misunderstood. First and foremost, most of the films that are being made today, at least in the United States, are often under-funded and are not being made for the audience. A huge part of that is the lack of education about film making. The education that most film students get is from TV programs like Mystery Science Theater 3000, which I am very thankful for. The problem with those programs is that they don't give a lot of information about how film is made. I wanted to do something that was educational, but it just wasn't possible to get the information I wanted. So I decided to make a documentary on the subject of film making, which was not something I was really ready to do. The problem with the way films are made is that it is not the audience's fault that they don't understand the process. The audience does not understand how things work, so they cannot help it. A film is a collection of images, and each image has a story behind it. This is a fairly simple concept, but I could not think of any other documentary that would touch on this subject in such a great way. Every image had a story, and if I could, I would have had a story for every image. I wanted to get inside the mind of each of the people who made the film, but I didn't know how. So I thought I would get a good story out of the images. And I did. I met with each person, asked them questions, and talked to them about what it was like to make the film. I got a lot of great insight into how the film was made, and how they felt about it. I met with the director, editor, and screenwriter of the film, and learned so much more about the process than I ever could have expected. I realized that a lot of people did not want to talk about what they were doing, because they didn't want to give too much away. I learned that the story behind the images is the story behind the film. The story behind the film is what it's all about. The images that the film was made of, were in fact images of their own creation. They were themselves, the film. If a person's life and death was a key part of the process, then the images themselves would have a story behind them. I met with a couple of people from Japan, and they had a similar opinion of the process, which is why they chose to not make a film. It is not that they didn't
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 10:04

Avery and Maria are two girls who lost their mother to a mysterious disease. They have no idea what happened to their mother, but Avery is convinced that she is being punished by the doctor, and Maria is convinced that she was killed in a car accident. The movie seems to be a flashback, and they are actually in their teens. A young Avery is working at a piano shop, but when she takes a liking to Maria, he starts dating her. But Maria is not convinced of this and keeps a secret from Avery. Meanwhile, the doctor begins experimenting on Maria to try and cure her. I found the movie very realistic. It's hard to believe that these two girls could be the victims of a psychotic, but also real, doctor. In one scene, Avery comes home and he sees a doctor with a syringe in his hand, and in another scene he sees a doctor trying to give an injection to Maria. He is convinced that he is about to die and that Maria is going to kill him. The movie is very good, because it shows what a teenage girl's mind is like. The movie also makes you think about the effects of these types of medical experiments. I was very surprised by the fact that Avery has a little girl at home. It's an interesting thing to see a young boy as the main character in a movie, because the boy is so unique. He's a normal boy, and he has a kind of personality that I really like. I don't know what the movie was trying to do, but it was a good one. It's very real, and the whole movie was very believable. It was a nice film.
Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 09:01

There are those who enjoy great literature like Sartre and Faurisson and there are those who have little or no interest in them. All of these people should watch the movie, although the movie will probably be less enjoyable for the latter. The writer of the novel who adapted it for the screen did a wonderful job with the script. It is the same writer who adapted the book Into Thin Air for the screen. However, the novel has a great screenplay and deserves to be on the screen. In the novel, the main character, or the "bewildered" narrator, must somehow use his knowledge of the unknown to attempt to get through the book. The writer took the novel, removed everything extraneous and substituted the novel with a fictional life. Thus, the novel becomes a "documentary" and the "documentary" becomes a "film." The novelist did a marvelous job at that. However, the screenplay was so incredible that the novel was far more enjoyable. That is the story of the adaptation. However, if the screenplay was not as fantastic as the novel, then the novel would not have been so much better adapted into a movie. There are many people who do not care about the novel and simply wish to see the movie adaptation. All of these people should see this movie. If you are a reader of the novel, then you will most likely like this movie. However, if you are not a reader, then you will most likely hate it. Because, this is a movie about the novel and the novel is great, then this movie is not very good. It is very subjective, and there is no real "correct" interpretation of the novel. Therefore, this movie is very good, but I would not call it a great movie. I think that the novel was better than the movie. Therefore, I am giving this movie a 7. There are many "somewhat" poor movies, but these ones are better than the others. Therefore, this movie is worth seeing.
Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 06:28

From director James Schamus, this drama based on a novel by Jean Mariel, about a middle-aged married couple that have decided to give up their life together. They both have mental illnesses, but both have become too comfortable with their condition. In fact, the couple, especially the husband, is no longer able to recognize it. I'm no psychiatrist, but I can tell you that having schizophrenia is not fun. Most of the people I know have seen it happen, and we have all been there. And the husband, played by a veteran actor, is now retired. There is a lot of evidence of his condition, but he's always looked at as just another person. He has only two close friends, and he spends his days doing things like reading books or attending meetings of religious organizations. When his wife, played by the great star of the past decade, begins to behave differently, he can't help but get worried. There is a scene where he tries to comfort his wife, but she seems to be out of control. He also takes some pills, but these don't seem to do anything. Finally, when the husband comes home, he has to deal with a little child who needs to be fed. He gets the husband, his daughter, and the friend to drive the child to a clinic. What follows is a brutal and violent fight between the mother and her daughter. This film is very much about a man's problems, and about the breakdown of his relationship with his wife. He tries to maintain a sense of control, but is too weak to see it through. This film was not well received at the time it was released, and I wonder why. Maybe it's because of the subject matter. If you think about it, there are other issues involved, and not all of them are as easy to ignore. For example, there is the issue of the mental health of the child. But it's not clear what the mother and father are doing to their son, or what the child is doing to the mother. It's hard to be able to connect with the film, and I think the lack of good communication between the film-makers is a major problem. There are some good performances, and there are some good scenes. But overall, this film has some flaws. I think a better script and better directing would have helped.


Write a review