Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Moka

Moka is a movie starring Emmanuelle Devos, Nathalie Baye, and David Clavel. A grieving woman pursues a couple who she suspects of killing her son in a hit-and-run.

Frédéric Mermoud
Emmanuelle Devos, David Clavel, Nathalie Baye, Diane Rouxel

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama
Director Frédéric Mermoud
Writer Frédéric Mermoud, Tatiana De Rosnay, Antonin Martin-Hilbert, Anne-Louise Trividic, Jean-Stéphane Bron, Antonin Martin-Hilbert, Frédéric Mermoud
Stars Emmanuelle Devos, David Clavel, Nathalie Baye, Diane Rouxel
Country Switzerland, France
Also Known As Η Γυναίκα με την Μερσεντές, Moca, Per mio figlio, I Gineka me tin Mersedes, A barna Mercedes, For My Son, Die Jägerin, モカ色の車, Mokka, Obsesia unei mame, Oğlum İçin
Runtime 1 h 29 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Consumed with grief and a silent rage over the loss of her teenage son who was killed in a hit-and-run, Diane, the devastated mother, takes the ferry across Lake Geneva to the spa town of Évian, in a desperate pursuit of the truth. Once there, the tragic mother armed with a well-concealed handgun and a graphic, yet incomplete description of the offending car will soon suspect that Marlène, the cryptic middle-aged salon owner, and her boyfriend, Michel, are somehow involved in the irremediable act. However, the path towards justice can be treacherous and serpentine, furthermore, will it make any difference finding the culprit behind the wheel?

Top reviews

Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 19:07

The film follows the events of a train robbery from the perspective of two of the perpetrators and their interactions with the police. While it is difficult to place any blame on the police or their officers, the role of the police has a very negative effect on the criminal behaviour. In the first scene we see two policemen stop the robbers, and one of them tells them that they have to get off the train. But the story doesn't end there, because two minutes later a third police officer arrives. And that is where the story starts to really change. One of the two robbers is arrested, and it is up to the police to decide how to handle this situation. They tell the robbers that they will call the police if they leave the train. And while they are waiting for the police to arrive, the second robber (who is arrested) decides to go and get a knife, and to continue the robbery. And this is where the film really goes to crazy. Because of the action of the police, and the absence of any real action from the criminal, the criminal has no motivation to continue the robbery. So he just decides to walk away from the train. And because of this situation, the criminal has to live with the fact that he has to continue the robbery. And he's now free from the police. And all he has to do is to get the knife from his friend and to continue the robbery. It's a very sad movie. Because it is a film about how crime affects innocent people. It's a film about how a crime affects the poor people and the criminals, and how the police fails to stop it.
Sunday, 17 May 2020 04:25

This is the first film I've seen by the great Argento. I'm very surprised that it hasn't received more attention, because it's not only a film that deserves more attention, but also a film that, in my opinion, surpasses its predecessor, Cosa Nostra. Argento plays the role of a journalist who, for some reason, is investigating a murder that took place in Argentina during the last years of the dictatorship. He is being dogged by the very people he is investigating, and who, in turn, harass him with all kinds of questions, concerning everything from his personal life to his personal life. The film has a great cast, but, above all, it's Franco Nero who really shines in this film. He's one of those actors that one doesn't get to see much in his career, but he's definitely a great actor. You can't imagine a Franco Nero film without him in it. His performance in this film is amazing. I loved the way he's so fascinated by the subject of the film. It's just one of the things I loved about the film. The second great thing about this film is the use of cinematography. This is the most interesting thing about this film. It's not that the use of cinematography in this film is very good, it's just that the use of cinematography in this film is simply brilliant. Every shot of the film is designed in such a way that it's just beautiful. And the most interesting thing about this film is the way that it goes from one atmosphere to another. In this film, Argento's use of cinematography really makes a difference to the film. The film is beautiful, but it also has that effect of making the viewer feel like the characters are sitting in a small theater with this beautiful camera work and the beautiful music. The music is very important in this film. It's very rare that a movie has such great music, but this is the case in this film. I think that the music in this film is one of the things that makes the film. The music makes the atmosphere in the film feel so great, it's just one of the things that really makes the atmosphere in the film. The film is certainly not a perfect film, but it's definitely a great film that deserves a lot more attention. The one thing I've always noticed about Argento's films is that they're definitely a film that you shouldn't miss. This is one of the
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 12:45

It has been long thought that young people were best suited to read about the wrong things, in a book, because the high contrast in their real world environment would dull the meaning of their writing. Most of their original work seems to have been written in their junior or senior years. Such a combination of factors would result in a new generation of copy-cats, in short, a new generation of literary fads. The first part of this film is a perfect example of this phenomenon. The dialogue is some of the most raw and fascinating I have ever encountered, as it will be for most viewers. The question of what it means to be young in a culture that was trying to mold you in the image of your parents is just one of the many ideas presented. The difference between the generation of the 80's and the generation of the 1990's is illustrated by how the film's main character says in the very beginning "I'm still not really ready for that". She is not ready to be independent. That's why she writes her work, she is not ready to be independent. The film is based on the idea that the 19th century gave birth to the 21st century. She's aware of the cultural differences between this new generation and the older generation, and she is trying to find a way to deal with these differences. The film has a very interesting art-house feel. It's not a documentary, not a movie about a writer, it's a film about writing and about the writing process itself, about the internal journey of a person, and it's a film about writing and about the journey of writing. One might argue that this approach to writing is not very mature, but it's a good approach to telling a story and a story is what this film does. The story of Moka (played by Anna Anthropy) is about a young woman who has just moved in a new apartment with her mother, who is an older woman with a husband and a child. The mother has lived for years in a different country, but she has been struggling to adapt to the new environment. She works as a cook, her daughter has just returned from a summer vacation. The mother is worried about her daughter's performance in school, and she wants to teach her to read and write. Her daughter is quite eager to learn, but the mother has no idea what to do with her. This movie is a good demonstration of the difference between the older generation and the younger generation. It
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 09:07

A month ago, the film Moka by Ben-Zvi was released. At first I was really disappointed that I was unable to watch it and was already sold to the idea of how can it be. And that is precisely what I felt the first time watching it, which is the worst thing that can happen to a film. The movie is quite a unique, but I had to wait for more than 2 weeks for the release of the video. I did, of course, miss the film, but that is what I had to do for my own curiosity and also that is what the film reminded me of. To be fair, I have read the book a long time ago and it is really a very personal book and I never really cared much for the film because it is not for me. However, I got the feeling that I have to admit that the film is really good. I felt the tension and the realization that there is a lot of bad things in the world. However, that is not what I wanted from the film. The film is about human being and the worst that people do is that they try to forget that there is a lot of bad things in the world. I think the movie was good and it is very good in this respect and I think it can be seen in the future because of how it is filmed. For the last year, I have watched the film and it is really very good, and it is the same for the book, I think that the book is better and I think that the film is better than the book. And that is why I was so disappointed that I missed the film. I think that it is very important to have a new film, so that people can see the film and the book. The film is only for people who can appreciate and understand the book, and it can not be a film for those who want to see the film just to see it. So I think that it is a good film, but not a great film.

Write a review