Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Puccini: La Bohème

(12) 7.5 187 min 2018 Subtitles and Closed Captions
Genres
Musical
Director
Matthew Diamond
Starring
Kelli O'Hara, Michael Fabiano, Marco Armiliato, Lucas Meachem

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Musical
Director Matthew Diamond
Writer Giuseppe Giacosa, Henri Murger, Luigi Illica
Stars Kelli O'Hara, Michael Fabiano, Marco Armiliato, Lucas Meachem
Country 140
Runtime 3 h 7 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K

Download musical «Puccini: La Bohème»

Blu-ray
16.86 GB
DVD
6.06 GB
Windows
6.16 GB
MacOS
8.01 GB
MKV
6.31 GB
MP4
6.19 GB
H.264
6.76 GB
H.265
6.19 GB
AVI
3.99 GB
MOV
7.58 GB
DivX
8.39 GB

Customers who watched «Puccini: La Bohème» also watched

  1. Elser
    Elser
  2. Tag Available on Prime
    Tag
  3. Where Hands Touch
    Where Hands Touch
  4. Detroit Available on Prime
    Detroit
  5. The Edge of Seventeen
    The Edge of Seventeen
  6. Bharat Available on Prime
    Bharat
  7. Chui lung
    Chui lung
  8. Es war einmal in Deutschland... Available on Prime
    Es war einmal in Deutschland...
  9. I'm Not Ashamed
    I'm Not Ashamed
  10. Just One More Kiss Available on Prime
    Just One More Kiss
  11. Macbeth
    Macbeth
  12. The Freedom to Marry Available on Prime
    The Freedom to Marry
  13. Yardie
    Yardie
  14. Beta Test Available on Prime
    Beta Test
  15. Fahrenheit 11/9
    Fahrenheit 11/9

20 customer reviews about «Puccini: La Bohème»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Diane Grant
Monday, 13 Apr 2020 18:55

I've watched this movie twice, and was quite surprised to find it so entertaining. I saw it in a local French theater, with the English translation, so I think I was not too far off the mark. It's very well-done, with a really interesting and witty script. The songs are so upbeat and exciting, that they actually made me dance. I also really liked the mannerisms and antics of the musicians. I have to admit, the music and the costumes are a bit overdone, but they do fit with the mood of the film. They are just the right amount of garish and sexy, and the ballet dancing is really well done. The whole plot is quite complex, but it's so easy to follow and the plot twists are so creative that it doesn't seem all that unbelievable. The cinematography is so beautiful, that you actually see a lot of Paris in it, and it's very easy to feel like you are in the old Paris during the 1920's. I don't think the only thing that would make this movie more enjoyable to French people would be a few more "kiss" scenes. (It's a bit ridiculous that there are no German or Italian songs on the soundtrack, though.I'm not sure why, maybe that was intentional.) If you are a big fan of this genre of film, then this is definitely worth a look.
Gary
Sunday, 12 Apr 2020 15:37

A colorful parody of the famous Fabergé egg recipe from 18th century France. The actor is an obvious copy of the original, only this time he is a composer, rather than an actor. "The Puccini" is a fine presentation of the music and especially of the orchestration. The main feature of the film is the "chamber-music", the Piazza San Giovanni in Rome, arranged by the film's director. The score is a mix of the most famous passages from Piazza San Giovanni, from Piazza del Popolo, and the classic Piazza Nazionale. This unique and original composition is very impressive and is completely comparable to the real one, which was created in the early 19th century. In the film the composer is a heroic Roman general, Fabricio Poggi, a very important composer of the times, when the city was under constant bombardment of the Prussians. There is also an important "army" character, Father Fabricio, played by the actor, who has the same characteristics as Father Poggi. The two actors are convincing, and they certainly have a great chemistry. The director takes a lot of liberties with the original text. The novel "Il Postino" by Visconti is taken as a reference. The music is very different. One can enjoy the rich orchestral background of Piazza San Giovanni, but the film does not exactly belong to the genre of Italian historical dramas. It could be more interesting for a small group of people who would like to see a film like this. But the film should not be taken too seriously, since it has a great script, and it is also a very good stage production, where the actors really work. The filming of the Piazza San Giovanni is really very good, and the directors' vision is very detailed. The movie is too beautiful to be taken seriously. It is a spectacular success and I am sure it will be mentioned in the same category as many great films of the 90s.
Paul Howard
Sunday, 12 Apr 2020 14:11

A little Czech-dubbed version of the ballet, This movie's a must for any classical dancer, whether they have to be up on their moves or not. I think it's a great concept for the original film, but the movie itself is very much better. This film looks like the original; the cast, the music, the choreography. It looks and feels like the original, which is great. But, as I mentioned before, the film is very much better. The ballet scenes are as good as they can get, but the direction is much better. They didn't waste time on much and, since they had such a great cast, I can't complain. I really like the choreography in this film, but it still needs some work. The direction is mostly fantastic. I think that it's great to have a movie that has a lot of great actors and it looks like they have a great budget for this film. The way they dance in the ballet is very exciting and really impressive. And that's not just for the choreography, but for the way they move and the way they move in this film. It's a great film, but it's definitely not the best of its kind.
Michael G.
Saturday, 11 Apr 2020 14:09

As the title suggests, this is a musical about the music of an 18th century Bohemian theatre troupe. It is not the best musical ever made, nor is it the best movie, nor even the best picture. But it is, on the other hand, the only one that I have seen that has both a song and a movie based on it. And it is definitely the best one. It does not just follow the basic plot, but includes all the main characters from the 18th century (there is also a character who belongs to the old fashioned Bohemian actors). And while it is not the best musical ever made, it is definitely the best movie based on it. Yes, the movie does contain several musical numbers, which include several original songs, but they are often much better than the songs in the movie. The songs are actually very good, so much so that they are better than the original songs in the movie. For example, I never expected to hear a song from Maria Callas, but when I heard her song, I thought it was awesome! I really don't know why I like this movie so much, but I do. For those who love the music of the 18th century, you will love this movie. For those who don't, you probably won't like it either. I recommend it to anyone who wants to see a musical and see it in a musical way. It's a movie for people who want to see a musical with the music in the movie.
Christian
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 03:16

I have seen this film twice, and thought it was a real surprise. The sets were very good and the costumes fabulous. My two favorite characters, that of the spoiled rich girl and the famous actor who takes her under his wing, were both very well done. They had the right mixture of charm and charmlessness, and the two were well-balanced. The movie was somewhat slow to begin with, but I think the audience got into it. My favorite character was the mother who was a vain and spoiled but funny woman, but when she said "I am afraid" it was worth the price of admission. I thought the music in the beginning was good, and the sets were beautiful. It was worth the price of admission. I think this movie was about as good as Marnie.
Ethan G.
Tuesday, 07 Apr 2020 18:19

Though I've never seen this one I will go back and watch it at some point, I've always enjoyed the older films of Bonnaire and of course Berlioz. I don't think it's fair to rate the newer ones negatively simply because they are newer. Berlioz is a legend. I think he's got it all in all. The current crowd might not like his movies. They just think he's stupid. I just think his films are genius and must be seen to be believed. I love him. This film is no exception. I love it, even if it's not all that great. I think that Berlioz is one of the greatest directors of all time, and this is certainly a beautiful film. It's a bit long, but that's the charm of his films. The great performances are fantastic, especially from Godard, De Sica, Verlaine, De Palma and of course Bonnaire. I think it's not only about the beautiful images. I think it's about the emotions. This film is a testament to what the human being can do with the power of cinema.
Maria B.
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 22:27

Well, first I would like to say that I am quite new to this movie genre. I was surprised by the presence of such actors as Bill Nighy, Patrick Stewart and Cate Blanchett. I had expected them to be more British and Americanised but they did not disappoint me. The songs are beautiful, romantic, sentimental and quite funny. And yes, there are some funny and fun sequences as well. Well, it is true that some scenes are quite hard to understand. But this is the basis for the praise I am giving it. And, although I have not seen the whole film, I still like it very much. It is a perfect movie to watch when you feel like a normal human being. The story is very nice and the music fits the scene perfectly. I also liked the well constructed and touching endings. This movie will make you smile and you will remember a lot of it. And you will be happy with the beauty of it and with your own thoughts, feelings and emotions.
Vincent Moore
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 21:02

As a child I did not appreciate the work of Richard Puccini and often felt he was incapable of conveying the emotion that one would expect from his music. Now, I feel this music has become more important to me as I have developed my knowledge and appreciation of the film. I have no doubt that I will find myself becoming more attracted to Puccini's music in the future. I am even more confident in the fact that I will become a much more accurate lover of this music. The creation of the theme is a wonderful performance, and one that should be given the widest audience possible. It is a very good movie and will hopefully help open up the world of Richard Puccini's music to people who do not appreciate it. The best thing about the movie is the whole presentation, especially in the final few scenes. Richard has a great imagination, and he makes some wonderful use of his music, but he also understands how to convey emotion to the viewer. I am not the only one who can appreciate that. He should be very proud of his efforts and the wonderful movie he has created.
Nicole Holmes
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 14:54

This is the third effort by Wolfgang Peterson and while it is very faithful to the original, it is much more commercialized. The focus here is much more on the music than the narrative and in my opinion this is the main reason for this film's success. The story follows the struggles of a very young man, Leopold, trying to become a conductor and performing with his orchestra. He is willing to go on stage with his quartet if he gets the chance. The director tries to establish some of the ambiance of the period and some of the traditional concepts that went along with the period, but the overall structure of the story is what will have you seeing this film in two different states of mind. One of the main criticisms that I have heard of this film is the music, but I think it was created well. For the most part the score is catchy and the performances are done well. The same can be said about the camera work, it is nicely done and not all the shots are of great quality. While the score has its flaws, it is the good acting and production design that make this film worth watching. As for the plot, it is certainly better than the first effort, but the fact that it is a commercial effort does make it seem a little forced and there is some dialogue that is not as engaging as I would have liked. Overall I think it is worth a look, especially if you like Wolfgang Peterson and enjoy his movies.
Keith Dean
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 07:21

The original composer is a nobody, and you know this from the opening titles. The music is only like the original, with some changes. Also, the director and actors have much different styles, from the classic 'Titian' (Filippo Tovoli) to the more recent 'Visconti' (Giovanni Bertorelli) (both roles seem to be based on the guy from Salo, but the one who died was never a known one). The music is very good, the songs are always catchy and always performed by Ennio Morricone. The director is a very good guy, he knows how to film, and he knows how to use the camera, and the editing is very good. The film is very funny, but the second part is a bit too long, because of the first part. The main actor is not a bad choice, and it is good to see a famous Italian star in a big-screen movie, but it would be a bit better if this guy was the only actor, since he has no great charisma. The main problem is that this guy is not in the movie long enough to understand everything. If you are a big fan of the original version, watch the version without the second part, it is much better.
Janet
Friday, 03 Apr 2020 05:58

This is a pretty good film, very well done. The score is great, the songs are well done and the style is perfect. The characterizations are not only interesting, they are also very well done. The movie has a story arc, is very logical and it makes sense. You can tell this is a fairy tale with fairies and magic. I also liked the photography and editing in the story. The scenes are well executed and there are no flat moments. The music is very good and fits the scenes. I like how the story is not centered on the main character, and how the story is told through different characters, but overall the story is great. It is very well told and it is consistent throughout. I also like how it does not have any real stand out characters, but how they all seem like normal people. I also like how there are also many children characters, which is interesting. The biggest issue I have is that the characters are too dark. The story was done better in the 1960's, but I would have liked to see the characters in a darker, more dramatic light. Overall, I am glad I watched this movie and I recommend it to anyone who wants to see a very good fairy tale movie.
Denise
Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 22:25

From his directorial debut to the follow-up, "La Bohème", Lamberto Bava's musical comedy "Puccini" (Rent) is full of hilarious moments. The story is of two disparate artisans who embark on a quest for an elusive painting. Bava and his cinematographer work well together to provide a movie with a very enjoyable, off-the-wall feel. Bava has a certain style to his movies and "La Bohème" is no exception. The film is full of fast cuts, whimsical dialogue, and camera angles that create a realistic feeling. The music, composed by the French pianist Claude Debussy, is very fitting. I think the film is going to be quite popular with the French movie-goers. There are so many other beautiful songs to choose from and I'm sure people will like the film more than I did. I personally think the movie is worth seeing and I'm sure everyone else will too. I'll definitely be adding this to my movie collection.
Jonathan H.
Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 20:59

The History of the Black Mass is a weird film for a very specific type of audience. The History of the Black Mass was made as a very low budget film by a small production company. This is actually a very good thing as the film is truly low budget and one could actually see the love for the art and the effort put in. There is a lot of talented actors in the film, the characters are all interesting and different and the music is really good. The Film's director, Vincent Canby, is known for directing other low budget movies like, Easy Meat and Three Days of the Condor. The Black Mass is definitely a film that is worth seeing if you enjoy the art of the genre. I definitely recommend this film to anyone who loves the art and history of the genre and is interested in the process of filming a film.
Marie D.
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 23:48

I had not expected much of this film. It was a "tired old" concept for the 1980s and it does not seem to have found its audience. It seemed to me that the film had been made only to make money and to pass it on to the youngsters. That is all the more reason why the film had to be so badly made. However, the first 30 minutes or so were a good surprise. The story was OK. It was interesting. It made the film worthwhile. However, towards the end the film got a bit absurd. It seemed that the director had lost the plot. It became slightly ridiculous. The scene where the camera views the music room is also quite amusing. It seems that the film makers had either lost interest or had not seen the same sort of film as the others. All in all, the film is a good way to pass the time. It is a bit better than the average but still not great.
Jessica Hunt
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 22:23

This is a strange, poetic and fascinating film. It is not a single short film, it is not a single narrative. It is a series of images, the frames of which move as one moves around in the film. The frames move in a curious way, that they give the illusion of movement. They move as one moves around in the film, the way we move around in our lives. The effect of the frames is breathtaking, their non-linear movement is a delight, but the images are not an aim, but a means, for the sense of the story. The images are so full of detail, so full of life, that they force us to view each frame with a kind of intimacy. The rhythm of the film is like a moving dream, like a day dream. It is not a story about the life of a man, but about a man, and the universe that he lives in. The film is as much about the way that he thinks, as it is about his actions, it is not about him. The images are as much about him as they are about the images, and the images are as much about him as they are about the images. We have to see the images to understand the stories. This is a strange film, and not for everyone. If you have any interest in art, you should see it.
Nathan M.
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 08:43

I thought this was an amazing film. At first I didn't really understand why this film was called "Puccini: La Bohème". But the movie goes on and on and it's even more awesome. My favorite thing about this movie is the music. There are also some songs in this film that I love. Overall I really love this movie. It's pretty awesome, and I definitely recommend it to anyone.
Kevin
Tuesday, 31 Mar 2020 16:15

This film is a compilation of many earlier PV albums, but it does not sound as if it was done in one take. The result is that it is very difficult to figure out which version is being played. The mixing of the songs has to be one of the most remarkable things about the film. Some of the songs are in the original and some are in the different versions. Also, some songs are extremely distorted, and in a strange way, those effects create a more realistic tone. This creates the impression that this is not an isolated incident. A third important thing about the film is the editing. The various tracks are shown at the same time, but the visuals are not synchronized. This is unusual for a TV movie, which usually works on a piecemeal basis. To understand the technical reason, just watch the cut of the recording of the song "Let's Pretend to be Happy". The song is supposed to be in one take. Yet, one of the people in the studio is cut to the background and the other one is cut in sync. That is because the shots are not synchronized. You would think that a movie like this would be a perfect match for a computer, but no. As the scenes are often repeated, the version was compressed, so the screen is reduced to make it fit the screen area. If this happens, the picture becomes a bit blurry. But when you watch the film again, you see the picture is much sharper, but the quality is still great. This is probably the technical reason for why the movie is so much more interesting than a typical PV video.
Jennifer P.
Monday, 30 Mar 2020 02:33

A reworking of the famous 1867 edition, this made for TV movie has an entirely different story to tell than the original.The climax is entirely different, and not quite as pleasing. I like the animated version better.I liked the ending, however.
Kathleen R.
Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 06:48

As someone who has gone through the process, I think this is one of the best videos I've seen. The group has a lot of excellent musical numbers. I have a problem with the writing of some of the songs, though. They're very boring. There's a song in this that starts with the word "crap" and then gets re-used over and over. The only thing that is really different is the lyrics. The singing is quite good. There's one that has nothing to do with the story but is sung in a way that's just absolutely wonderful. It has so much fun to it that I can't help but be mesmerized by it. I don't think there's much of a point to this, though. I was not impressed with the way the movie moved along. It was pretty slow and dragged on a lot. The movie seemed to be going in circles. I really don't understand why it was called "La Bohème." I'm surprised that this has been so well received.
Karen
Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 03:35

I'm only a casual fan of this film, and a die-hard fan of Bresson's art, but I saw this on television. The title refers to the voice of the diva, and the music is beautiful and haunting. It's great to hear people laughing, crying, and talking (I assume) about Bresson's work. I'd love to watch this again.
See all 20 reviews
 Write a review