Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Risk

(1912) 6.3 86 min 2016 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Risk is a movie starring Julian Assange, Sarah Harrison, and Jacob Appelbaum. The story of WikiLeak's editor-in-chief Julian Assange as seen by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.

Genres
Documentary
Director
Laura Poitras
Starring
Joseph Farrell, Sarah Harrison, Julian Assange, Jacob Appelbaum

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Documentary
Director Laura Poitras
Writer Laura Poitras
Stars Joseph Farrell, Sarah Harrison, Julian Assange, Jacob Appelbaum
Country Germany, USA
Also Known As Vem är Julian Assange?, Asylum, Ryzyko, Kuka Julian Assange?
Runtime 1 h 26 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description The story of WikiLeak's editor-in-chief Julian Assange as seen by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.

Download documentary «Risk»

Blu-ray
15.85 GB
DVD
5.05 GB
Windows
5.15 GB
MacOS
7 GB
MKV
5.3 GB
MP4
5.18 GB
H.264
5.75 GB
H.265
5.18 GB
AVI
2.98 GB
MOV
6.57 GB
DivX
7.38 GB

Customers who watched «Risk» also watched

  1. Monsters and Men
    Monsters and Men
  2. Bad Boys for Life Available on Prime
    Bad Boys for Life
  3. Boundaries
    Boundaries
  4. Moonlight Available on Prime
    Moonlight
  5. Mænd & høns
    Mænd & høns
  6. Head Full of Honey Available on Prime
    Head Full of Honey
  7. American Satan
    American Satan
  8. I Can Only Imagine Available on Prime
    I Can Only Imagine
  9. Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World
    Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World
  10. Saga of Tanya the Evil Movie Available on Prime
    Saga of Tanya the Evil Movie
  11. Pupille
    Pupille
  12. Ce qui nous lie Available on Prime
    Ce qui nous lie
  13. Paddington 2
    Paddington 2
  14. Breath Available on Prime
    Breath
  15. National Theatre Live: Hamlet
    National Theatre Live: Hamlet

34 customer reviews about «Risk»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Amanda J.
Thursday, 25 Jun 2020 08:51

A documentary that addresses the debate over genetically modified foods. Rather than sit on the fence over what is or isn't beneficial for the environment, the film dives into the study of the issue. They examine the problem, talk with those who have studied it and those who are trying to find out what it is and why it's happening. They talk with some companies that are involved in it and hear their opinions. There are a lot of good points made in the film. The main one is that no matter what, we have to be realistic. How could a plant eat by itself and grow for thousands of years. In terms of increasing yields, increased growth, and other changes, it's all a myth. There's so much that's going on and it's not all solved by them. There are other points that are made that are important, but there is a lot of potential for getting misinformation out there. The questions that are raised in the film could be found everywhere. I'm sure you've heard or read that eating eggs will raise your IQ. That's not the case, they do in fact raise IQs in rats. In terms of the human aspect, you'd be better off taking the animal nutrition route and try eating the foods out of nature that are out there that have the most nutrients. That can help you and it can also help the environment. If it's out there, it's not poison. There's actually some food out there that's going to be a big help to the environment. Those are just some of the points that the film makes and they're all valid. I think that the film was very well done and I think that it can help educate the public. There are a lot of people that are confused, but I don't think that it's going to change anyone's opinion. People need to make their own decision and research it on their own. There's not going to be a definitive answer.
Richard Wells
Monday, 22 Jun 2020 12:09

This is the story of how Risk, the game, was in the theater in the early 90's and how it inspired my own desire to play the game and live the experience. I grew up with the game, so to me this was a "trip down memory lane". And, there were a lot of things I could relate to. It was at that time in my life when I was about 13-14, I was still living with my parents, I was a bit lost in the world, I didn't know who I was. I didn't know who I was. I did know that I wanted to be an artist, and that was my passion. But, I had to find my way in the world. I had to show my talent and talent for music to get people to pay attention to me. I had to teach myself how to be in a group and talk to other musicians and it took me 7 years to find my way. I had to be brave, and I was. I did not know how to be a rock star, but I knew I was a singer and that's what I wanted to do. I had to show people how to find my voice and how to become an artist, not just a musician, to be a rock star, I didn't know what I wanted to do, but I had to try. I had to live the game, and I had to be brave enough to do it. And, when I finally got into the band, I started playing the music, and it became my mission. This documentary will not educate the audience. It's more of an inspiration and a testament to how it is to be an artist. But, this film does have a great message. When I first saw the game, it was at a very young age. It was a really nice thing to see, but I did not know how to play Risk. It taught me what I needed to know to be an artist and how to live the game.
Rose
Monday, 22 Jun 2020 06:12

This documentary focuses on the "Risk" project run by the London School of Economics and Political Science. It shows how even a "small" country like the United Kingdom can have a massive impact in changing the way people think. The students of the university have already begun to make their mark in the world and the student body is ready to keep on climbing. By putting their own little country first, these students are going to be making a lasting impact on the world. The documentary covers the biggest issues of our time: climate change, poverty, inequality, etc. It covers all of these issues but also takes a look at the ethical side of things. Some of the subjects covered in the documentary are: global warming, pollution, and the effect of the oil industry on the environment. I enjoyed this documentary and would recommend it to anyone who has an interest in making an impact in the world.
Madison R.
Sunday, 21 Jun 2020 04:42

I was actually surprised at how much I enjoyed this documentary. It was a completely different view of myself, but not one I felt it necessary to tell others. I wasn't the only one surprised. It's a rare opportunity to see your life in the eyes of an actual audience and the director just seemed to capture the essence of a lot of the people he spoke to. He did a fantastic job, and I highly recommend it. The many interviews were quite interesting, and each person's story and personality was completely distinct. It was like someone was able to talk to you for one hour. I felt like I got a lot of things I didn't want to hear, but was still impressed by the depth of insight and revelation. A great documentary.
Lisa Martinez
Thursday, 18 Jun 2020 13:56

I'm a recovering drug addict, and I've worked with rehab centers and a support group to help them with their difficult problem. I've also been on the medical side of the equation, helping families dealing with the sickness of their loved ones. From my perspective, "Risk" isn't really a documentary. It's more of a testimony to what addicts and their families are going through, in addition to being a warning to everyone of what is going on. What I found most heart-wrenching in this film was the suffering of the people being treated. I remember a woman I worked with at a support group that was dying, from heroin use, and was a very thin and frail woman. She had worked all her life to provide for her family, and was worried that something was wrong with her husband. In my opinion, she had taken on too much too soon, and was very worried. I was in tears listening to her tell the story of what they were going through, and being in her office in the middle of the night. I'm sure it was hard for her to accept that she was going to die, and it was very hard for me to hear it. All the people that you hear talking about how they are not only dealing with the horrible side effects of drugs, but also have the daily struggle of dealing with the loved ones, as well. I also felt that the entire documentary showed the whole spectrum of drug use, from the puking addicts to the fast-acting drug addicts. This was a very special thing about this film, and I think that it definitely speaks to everyone. It's very powerful, and I wouldn't have been surprised if this was the first documentary to ever be shown in Hollywood. I can't say enough good things about "Risk". It's definitely one of the most powerful documentaries I've seen, and I'm definitely recommending it to anyone that I know.
Matthew Franklin
Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 04:59

David Hall makes a good case in his memoirs that political and religious conflict is largely about how we view the world, rather than the differences between us. He then goes on to take us back in time and explains how people's attitudes to their neighbor were always changing in this way. But before the 1960s, we see people from many different religious backgrounds, ranging from Baptists and Episcopalians to Jews, Catholics, and Jehovah's Witnesses. And everyone was so obsessed with their differences that they usually denied all the others the right to live the way they wanted. And, as this film shows, the way we view the world was always changing, too. Just ask people who are now trying to enforce the new gay marriage law. As the film concludes, these people are not the only ones who have been shaped by their experiences. As we get older, we understand that there are more similarities between us and our friends than differences. And as we get older, we realize that those differences have not changed. We may be wiser, but we are not any better or smarter, as the movie has shown. We are the same.
Jessica Jones
Friday, 05 Jun 2020 00:07

I saw this movie at Sundance, where it won the Audience Award. I thought the story was pretty interesting and it does show how a company would deal with life without full privacy. It also shows what privacy does to our sense of reality. It shows how a company would deal with things like family and religion and sex. The acting was very good. I think the problem with the movie is that it makes very few points. They take very few risks and instead of showing us what the company does and what it means to the people around them, it shows them doing the same thing. What the movie is about is trust, and how people just want to forget about what they know. They want to forget everything that doesn't fit in, just in case. The movie tries to get us to trust that companies just want to do what they want, just like they want to forget what they know. The movie tries to get us to forget about facts about privacy and how it affects people, but it never really gets us to trust what the company is doing. Instead, we just want them to forget everything. When they show us how the company tries to convince people that they are doing the right thing, it's a little bit scary. It's almost like they are trying to give us a lesson. We're supposed to believe that they know what they're doing, but that doesn't mean we should believe everything they say. It also fails on the truth factor. It never really tells us what the company is doing. It tries to show how the company does something, but it never gets us to see it. The company is either going to lie to us or make it up, but it never really shows us that they are actually doing anything. They are only doing what they want to do, and they know exactly what they're doing. I don't think it's a good movie, but I think it's pretty good. It's a good movie for people who don't like spy movies or want to be surprised, because you never know what they're going to do. They never really show us why they're doing anything, or what their intentions are. I also like how the movie is short. It's not very long, and it really doesn't get any dramatic moments. It doesn't show you a big action movie, but it also doesn't show you how much they're spending. It's like you're watching a documentary. It's basically about them not revealing what they're doing, and that's what I like about the movie. It's a good movie for people who like the movie Five Days.
Melissa B.
Tuesday, 26 May 2020 20:15

Back in 1989 when the first installment of the James Bond franchise was released, the general public was in the throes of a major panic over the possibility that a woman would play the titular role. The idea that a woman could play a spy from another country seemed preposterous to say the least. The UK's own ELF (ex-Spy agent) was thought to be the most suitable candidate and had been preparing for her debut for nearly 10 years. This documentary follows in the footsteps of ELF, diving into her life, training, and how she started her career. This film was clearly meant for an audience familiar with her story, and is therefore a must for anyone who knows of her story or knows someone who has. Although this documentary is very informative and gives you a good understanding of what ELF was like at the time, it is extremely hard to listen to for those unfamiliar with her story. In my opinion, the acting is very good, and the events she describes are very credible, but I felt that I would have enjoyed the film more had it been delivered in a more convincing manner.
Michelle G.
Monday, 25 May 2020 06:59

It's not all doom and gloom. As a comedy, it was just that. I actually laughed quite a bit. I also think the people who gave it bad reviews really missed the point. I've never seen a documentary that doesn't have an agenda. It's very clear that some things that aren't as easy to point out in an overview video are covered in depth. It's a brilliant film about a lot of interesting topics, and it's not afraid to show things that are less controversial, to get a better point across. The other thing I liked about it is that it never tries to be as real as some documentaries that have become famous. We see only the people, not a bunch of documentary experts or a list of facts, like other documentaries. I also like the fact that you don't have to know anything about the subjects to get the point. Just listening to the voices of the people interviewed, you can't help but understand that they're just talking about it. The other thing I liked was that it wasn't a regular documentary, but a very short one. You see only a couple of interviews, not many of them, but you're never bored. It's a great documentary, but only if you're up for a few hours of your time. I would definitely recommend this to people who are into independent cinema. It's definitely worth watching if you want to learn more about something that you can relate to.
Lawrence
Thursday, 21 May 2020 08:38

This documentary is not necessarily a documentary. In fact, it's more of a retrospective discussion of a remarkable career in which he delivered "groovy" music in the 70's that reflected the times. Much of it was published in music magazines such as Spin, and it is of great cultural value as well as being timely as well as being technically competent. The video is produced by Keith Emerson, who co-produced the documentary with Emerson and Marr. The videos "Behind the Music" is a lot better than "Behind the Scenes" or "Behind the Press". It's not a complete documentary of The Chordettes. It gives a good overview of their work. "Interviews" is a series of videos with interviews with people involved in the band, including Charles Nelson Reilly, Dave Stewart, Leon Russell, and Carol Vorderman. Keith Emerson was a friend of Chordettes singer Jack Hartley. I recommend this to anyone interested in the music, the people involved, or any of the things "behind the music".
Timothy B.
Thursday, 21 May 2020 02:50

To think that people with a tragic history of mental illness could have so much influence on society. Some such as Boney M are completely deserving of the title of terrorist and is a shame that he was portrayed in such a way. Michael King from the LAPD should have been his judge, jury and executioner for putting Boney in jail and murdering many people because of his mental illness. A better person would have been executed by the LAPD instead of a convicted murderer. That being said, some of the topics that were brought up during this documentary were enlightening and it may have added more to the viewing experience for those that are familiar with Boney's life and death.
Sara Pierce
Monday, 18 May 2020 11:56

Being a longtime HLS student, I was very interested in seeing this documentary. However, I still think it could have been improved by more editing, a more satisfactory conclusion. For instance, during one of the interviews, the interviewer states that she believes the principal was wrong in doing his job. However, shortly after this was stated, the interviewee is shown not reacting to this statement. The same thing happened when he stated that the nurses should have been included in the decision-making process. The interviewer's lack of understanding of this aspect of the documentary was evident, and it made the video less compelling. I would recommend this film to anyone who has ever been involved in a "community college". I would also recommend this documentary to anyone who has been involved with community colleges, to gain a greater understanding of the people who are involved. These people have taught us more than we ever learned in school.
Nathan
Saturday, 16 May 2020 02:59

In the documentary, "A Dangerous Mind: The Adventures of Ted Kaczynski," hosted by "60 Minutes" veteran Mike Wallace, writer and director Louis Malle gives a really thorough analysis of Kaczynski's thought process, how he handled what he thought was his situation, and what he saw that convinced him that he could take on the US government. To my knowledge, this was the first major film profile of Kaczynski, and Malle did a good job in pulling together an accurate and comprehensive history of his life and his philosophy. It's a pity that Malle had to skip over the classic 80s "JFK" documentary that was released three years later, so this would have been the perfect opportunity to show his next film, "The Unforgiven" about the life and career of Clint Eastwood. If you want to see Kaczynski and his thought process, this is the documentary you're looking for.
Debra
Friday, 15 May 2020 21:11

In the wake of a spate of high profile campus sexual assault scandals, the "Risk" documentary presents a range of campus advocates and commentators who have worked to prevent and respond to these crimes. They range from academics, legal, and law enforcement officials, as well as a number of former students, from the time of the original problem until now. The documentary is quite comprehensive in presenting the stories of both victims and perpetrators, as well as providing a case history that includes prominent college names such as the infamous Stanford rapist Brock Turner and the University of Virginia's rape crisis facilitator (and victim) Katherine Connely. As a result, "Risk" is an interesting and useful look at the state of sexual assault on college campuses across the country. I was impressed with the advocacy work by both the authors and the documentary makers, and while I feel there are still some gaping holes in the story that could have been used to improve the documentary, it is still a very compelling look at the problems of sexual assault on campus and how the solution could be implemented. I found the video itself to be well put together and well-edited, and it provides a solid level of insight on the problem of campus sexual assault. However, as a documentary, it leaves out a lot of crucial information, like the statistics, the rates of sexual assaults, the perpetrators, and the length of time that perpetrators wait before they go through with their crimes. To me, this is very important information, because although the results of the report by the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault released earlier this year does provide some much-needed information, the statistics are a very incomplete picture. It seems as though the White House and the Task Force simply skipped over this important information, because the researchers failed to mention any relevant statistics on the time that perpetrators wait before committing their crimes. While the researchers failed to provide any statistics on the actual length of time that perpetrators wait, it does seem as though they skipped over some important information on the actual results of these crimes, because they failed to mention the results of any rape cases from the period covered in the documentary. For example, the most recent data shows that the rate of sexual assault increased during the year that the White House Task Force was studying, but at the same time, the rate of victims reporting their cases to the police dropped significantly from the year prior to the Task Force's study. The Task Force's report also fails to mention the fact that there are many survivors who are reluctant to come forward, because of the stigma of going to the police. Because the Task Force report includes only one statistic on the victim's reaction to the results of the Task Force's study, it appears that they omitted data from a major study conducted by the National Institute of Justice. It seems that they included the "one time prevalence" statistic, but they failed to include the statistics that show that the rate of survivors reporting their cases to the police increased significantly from the year prior to the Task Force's study. In addition, the researchers failed to provide any statistics on how many perpetrators were the perpetrators of these crimes, but it seems that the statistics that were provided in the report simply assumed that there were one or two perpetrators. For example, one respondent in the survey indicated that only two of the twenty victims she had had sex with had a violent criminal history. This may indicate that the respondents were able to tell that at least two victims were violent criminals, but it seems as though these statistics were not included in the report. It is also interesting to see that the most "high profile" campus advocates interviewed, most notably former Harvard President Larry Summers, failed to mention any statistics about the reasons why college students are not trying to do better in their sexual education classes. Summers, who has been a prominent voice in the field of college sexual assault and has been the subject of several media articles in the past few years, is one of the few witnesses interviewed by "Risk." His comments, however, seem to indicate that college students are simply incapable of doing
Crystal
Wednesday, 13 May 2020 12:13

The movie is "robot madness". It is a documentary about the Roomba vacuum cleaner. Some may think this is a really bad documentary. And they are right. There are tons of useless information about Roomba. It was interesting for me to watch a documentary about Roomba. It's very strange that these robots are an interesting topic. I'm actually really bad at following the Roomba documentary and it seems to be very hard to get an overview. And the narration made me think, but I couldn't understand. I didn't want to watch it until it ended, because I think it would be better to be alone and think about the "robot madness". Overall, I think that it is a great movie. I give it a 7 out of 10.
James W.
Wednesday, 13 May 2020 06:25

As I am a huge Riptide fan, I have always wanted to see this movie on the big screen and now I can and I am glad to have. Riptide's soundtrack is extremely great and it is really what this movie is all about. As this is the first "fan film" I have seen I would like to say I am a huge fan of Riptide as a film and I am definitely going to see more movies. All the action scenes and scenes with Riptide were fantastic. The director does a great job and keeps you on the edge of your seat, all I can say is that the music and the visuals just make it so much better than the previous one. The only thing I think would have been better would be to have been able to hear the music at certain moments in the film. I hope the directors take the next step and do a series of videos with other songs and I am sure they will enjoy the fans. So if you are a Riptide fan, do not miss this one.
Nathan J.
Sunday, 10 May 2020 21:28

I had watched the documentary on a screening at the Toronto International Film Festival. It's a great documentary, but it's a little overlong. I'd suggest that you skip it, but if you haven't seen it, you should catch it on cable.
Amanda
Saturday, 25 Apr 2020 18:23

I'm still not sure what people's problem is with this film. I honestly didn't expect anything but the result was worth watching. This film is essentially a profile of three men, all trying to make it in the business of oil, each with a different story, and each with different view points on the oil business. I'm not saying the story is good or bad, but it is an interesting look at different viewpoints. One of the reasons I wanted to watch this film is because of an older (2003) film about people involved in the oil business called "Lone Star." It's quite an interesting story of how one person, trying to make it in the industry, can turn into a very bitter person trying to make his way back in. The producer of "Lone Star" is making a sequel to the film and it's really fascinating watching the differences between the two. "Lone Star" is more of a "what if" film about the relationship between one person and one other person and the people who worked with him, while "The Risk" is a more traditional "What if the movie is just like this?" film. I liked this film because of it's history. It is an interesting look at what it's like to be an oil business person. I highly recommend it.
Carol
Monday, 20 Apr 2020 18:31

I read the reviews for Risk and was so excited to see it. I was so wrong. I will not go into detail with the details of the film, but it is full of information about a place I have never heard of. We know there are people living in K2, but we have never heard of any of them. They are not told how to act or what their culture is, yet they do not speak English and do not want to communicate with us. We are left to take these encounters as they come, and for the most part they are interesting and informative. At the end, we are left to wonder what more we could have learned. I wonder if I could have gotten more information about what is going on there, or what their culture is like. I think Risk will inspire people, but it is certainly not the same as going there and learning more about the culture. It is a little like going to the islands. They are not inhabited by native people, and we cannot tell you anything about them. They are not as interesting or intriguing as the islands are. If we would have visited the islands, I am sure we would have heard of them and the people. I think it is a good idea to take people with us who are not familiar with the culture to see it for themselves, as many people do not have a good understanding of it. I recommend it to those who have not seen it.
Zachary H.
Saturday, 18 Apr 2020 03:46

Though the movie left many questions unanswered, this movie is a must see for everyone who wants to know more about the people who were at the bottom of the corporate food chain.I thought this movie was great, i would like to thank you all for this great movie, i think it would be a great gift for a friend or family member.I think it should be in everyone's library.
Michelle J.
Sunday, 12 Apr 2020 09:32

I just watched this on DVD and it is really a shame that the story is left out, it would have added some depth to the film and the main character, particularly the first 10 minutes or so. I feel that the more experienced film-makers should be more cautious about such 'feel good' films and make them as real as possible. The story is simply about a guy getting involved with a girl he meets at the start of the film. I will not spoil it but the story does move along at a good pace, and although it is not very exciting it is not dull either. The actors do well, even though there is little dialogue it is easy to tell what is going on and the editing is well done. It is also worth noting that the film is not a comedy or drama, and that a lot of the subject matter is quite serious. The film is pretty good, if you are looking for a good film to watch with a friend I would recommend it.
Betty
Friday, 10 Apr 2020 14:45

A fascinating and interesting documentary about the events leading up to the first moon landing, the dangers involved and the struggles the Apollo crew had to go through. The film shows the "bads" of the mission, the problems with the launch and the problems with the landing itself. It also shows the "good" aspects of the mission, the technical difficulties and the lessons learned. The only thing I didn't like was the voice-over narration of the film, it was a bit too much like a news report and not a documentary. Overall, I highly recommend this documentary.
Christina L.
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 10:01

The first thing I want to say about Risk is that it is very well made. The story is very well told and the way the characters are shown is very well done. The acting is very good, and the directing is very good. The only problem I have with this film is that it is very slow, and the characters are very one dimensional. The only character that I thought was very interesting was the one that is the father. I liked the way he was portrayed and the way he talked. The other characters are very one dimensional. I also have a problem with the way the director made the film. I think he made the film very slow, and I think it is very hard to tell what is going on. I think it would have been better if he had made the film faster, and I think that would have made it a better film. The way the film was made was very slow, and I think it is very hard to tell what is going on. Overall, Risk is a very good film. It is very well made, and the way the story is told is very good. I would recommend this film to anyone who is looking for a good film to watch.
Jason K.
Monday, 06 Apr 2020 11:22

I thought this film was very well done. It was not so much about the consequences of climate change, but the effect that it has on the people who live there. There is a lot of talk about the science, but the message is about the people and the way they live their lives. The film is very well put together and I am glad that it was not made for the masses. I thought that the editing was excellent. It was a very well done film, and I think that it is worth watching. I am not a scientist, but I think that the film does a good job of showing the science behind it.
Aaron Dunn
Sunday, 05 Apr 2020 03:47

The risks of the world's most dangerous activities are examined in a very sober, well-balanced way, with a keen eye for the ethical implications of what we do, or rather, what we think we do. The film shows that a few people, if they are lucky, can make a difference in the world. It also shows that the decisions that we make, when we do them, can affect the lives of billions of people, and the risks that we take, and the decisions we make, can affect us. The film is a must-see for anyone who wants to learn more about what is going on in the world today. The film is a good resource for anyone who wants to know more about the risks of the world's most dangerous activities, and who wants to learn more about the ethics of what we do, or rather, what we think we do. If you are looking for a movie that can give you an insight into the world of the people who are risking their lives in order to achieve the things that we want to achieve, then this film is for you.
Patrick Mitchell
Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 17:30

Based on his documentary 'Killing by Death' this film is a 'Citation Needed' documentary. The audience is not allowed to voice their opinion and is just encouraged to watch and 'taste' what it is that the documentary is about. It is a fun story of just one single man and the journey that he has to endure to find justice for the murder of his mother. This is not to say that the director failed in his job of producing a compelling and factual documentary. The quality of the film is superb and it is recommended to all. On the other hand this film is not just about one single man. On the contrary it is about all of us. The documentary just wants to show the humanity of all of us and the point of view of the human being. The use of documentary makes it difficult to understand the film but it is essential to remember that this is a documentary not a documentary about a single person. So it is recommended that you should watch this film with an open mind, do not expect anything and just enjoy it and learn from it. In short this is a film that tells the story of the human being and the depth of all the events that take place around him. This is a real documentary and it is one of the best documentary ever made.
Kathryn Lewis
Thursday, 02 Apr 2020 09:06

This film was good, even if I didn't really get all the technical details. There were some scenes where I had trouble following the dialogue and direction, but I found them to be a testament to the acting, editing and the whole scene. I also think this movie could have been done a lot better, like with the audio, but I think that's just me being nitpicky. I'm glad I saw this film, because I'm still seeing it today. I wouldn't have seen it in the theatre, because I would have had a hard time understanding all of the scenes, and I don't want to spend the time getting lost if I had to pay to see it at the theater. I thought this film was great, and I'm very glad I saw it.
Emily F.
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 00:24

I'm not going to lie, I was a bit skeptical when I first heard about this documentary, especially when I read some of the reviews here on IMDb. I didn't want to waste my time with something that was going to be a bore. I also had no interest in seeing any of the celebrities involved in the film. But I am happy to say that I am very glad that I did watch it and that I did not waste my time. This documentary is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. The main reason that I enjoyed this film so much is that it is very realistic. It doesn't pretend to be anything that it isn't. It doesn't have a happy ending, it doesn't have a happy ending that is in the film. It is simply about the challenges that a family has to face when they are faced with a crisis. The documentary is very informative and is a must see for anyone that wants to know more about the subject of post-traumatic stress. It is a very powerful documentary that will have you thinking about the risks that you take when you are dealing with something that is very traumatic. It is a documentary that will make you think about the risks that you take when you are dealing with something that is very traumatic. This documentary is very informative and is a must see for anyone that wants to know more about the subject of post-traumatic stress.
Kenneth Hunter
Tuesday, 31 Mar 2020 22:58

I found the documentary very informative. It shows the challenges of modern society and how it is changing. It is also a very interesting look at how the people in the documentary have reacted to the changes. The documentary is extremely well done. The interviews are very well done and the documentary is well edited. It is well worth seeing. I would recommend this documentary to anyone interested in the subject.
Tammy Smith
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2020 17:35

I've been a film critic for nearly twenty years and have seen a lot of films. I am a big fan of documentary, and this film was one of the best I have seen in the past decade. It was well made and the acting was excellent. The movie is a very personal look at how people deal with the threat of terrorism. It is not about the events of 9/11, but about the psychological and emotional trauma that is created when people lose loved ones to terrorists. I think the director was very clever in using footage from the news and from the film "Al-Qaeda: Behind the Mask". It is a very well made documentary and I would recommend it to anyone.
Jonathan Jackson
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2020 07:43

If you are not a fan of the "Star Wars" films, then this documentary will not appeal to you. The film is interesting, but not very compelling. The documentary is a bit slow, and does not have a strong focus. However, it is well worth watching, especially if you are a fan of the films. This documentary is about the "Star Wars" films, and not the original trilogy. It is worth watching, even if you are not a fan of the films.
Mary Jones
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2020 05:31

There's no point in telling you that the internet is full of people who are making money off of you. And that's what I find really sad. Because you're probably not a person who is going to be spending money on something like this, and you don't need to be. But it's also true that there are people who are so addicted to it that they don't want to see the truth. This documentary on the site of the internet startup Digg is a prime example of this, and it's fascinating. The documentary is about the rise and fall of the site, and how it was the first truly popular website in history. And that's a bit of a paradox. It's really good, but it's also really depressing. I would have preferred a more uplifting documentary. Instead, this documentary just tells us how a website got so popular and how it became the Internet's most popular site. I can see that Digg's popularity was due to the fact that it was the first truly popular site in history, but it also made it a target for various kinds of people who wanted to exploit it for money. The documentary could have been about the reasons for Digg's popularity. But instead, it's mainly about how Digg's users were targeted by the site's owners, and how the site went bankrupt. And it's not really that hard to see how this all came about. The fact that Digg had an initial audience of 5 million users makes it hard to see what the big deal was about it. It's also not that hard to see how the site's owners tried to make money from it. I think that it's also a bit of a contradiction that Digg's owners weren't really interested in what they were doing. That it's a huge success and a major success for a site that was just born, and that it's still growing today, but they weren't really interested in what they were doing. But the film makes it pretty clear that the owners were probably interested in the success. The documentary doesn't focus on the founders of the site. They don't really give any background information on them, other than the fact that they were investors. And that doesn't really help in understanding how they got involved with the site. But I guess that it's also true that the founders of the site were probably interested in the site's success, because that's how they got involved with it. And this is the big problem with this documentary. It's really boring. It's not really interesting. It's just a long boring documentary that really doesn't say anything interesting. It just tells us how the site got popular, and how it was targeted by various kinds of people. I think the founders of Digg probably knew that they were doing something that was illegal. But they were probably also interested in the success that the site had. But what they didn't know is that they were also making money from it. And they were probably also involved in the business. That's probably the most interesting part of the documentary. Because it's a really interesting story. It's not really boring, and it's actually really interesting. It tells us that a site was already successful, and then suddenly it was a target for people who wanted to exploit it for money. And it tells us that this kind of business is really illegal. But it also tells us that this is a business that's very lucrative, and that it's growing at a rapid pace. And it tells us that it's the biggest business in the world. It's also a really interesting story, and it's really interesting to hear that people were willing to do things like this to get the attention of the site's owners. And it tells us
Samantha
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2020 05:02

I have just watched the film "Risk" and it is really a great documentary. I have to admit that I watched it in 2 days (which is not normal for me). I am usually quite cynical about documentaries and this film really surprised me. I was quite happy that it was going to be a low budget documentary, because it did not have any big names, big stars, etc. but still, it was a great documentary and I really enjoyed it. I think this is the kind of documentary that is not as good as it could be, but is still really good. I really hope that there is a sequel of this film, because I really love the documentary.
Brenda
Tuesday, 24 Mar 2020 04:51

This film was one of the most interesting and rewarding experiences I have had during the past year. The film features the writing and direction of David Gordon Green, whose writing is excellent and his directing is amazing. The film is one of the best documentaries I have seen in a long time. It's not really a documentary per se, but rather a story about the life of a man, Shane, who was just like all of us. He had a wife, a young daughter, and a great job. All of that went out the window when his daughter was born and he was homeless. He was living with his younger daughter and his mother and father in Texas. The documentary was filmed in the same manner as the movie "A Walk to Remember", which was great because they both focused on one man and one person in their lives. I highly recommend this film and will definitely be purchasing it on DVD. It was also a pleasure to see the same director of the movie "A Walk to Remember" on the film, "Catching Fire", which is a different film, but still very similar. I hope that everyone can find this film to be worthwhile. It was great to see and hear the director talk about his writing and directing in this film.
See all 34 reviews
 Write a review