Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Il racconto dei racconti - Tale of Tales

Il racconto dei racconti - Tale of Tales is a movie starring Salma Hayek, Vincent Cassel, and Toby Jones. From the bitter quest of the Queen of Longtrellis, to two mysterious sisters who provoke the passion of a king, to the King of...

Horror, Drama, Fantasy
Matteo Garrone
Toby Jones, John C. Reilly, Salma Hayek, Vincent Cassel

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Horror, Drama, Fantasy
Director Matteo Garrone
Writer Massimo Gaudioso, Ugo Chiti, Edoardo Albinati, Giambattista Basile, Matteo Garrone
Stars Toby Jones, John C. Reilly, Salma Hayek, Vincent Cassel
Country UK, Italy, France
Also Known As Pentameron, 五日物語 3つの王国と3人の女, Tarujen taru, 異色童話集, El cuento de los cuentos, Το παραμύθι των παραμυθιών, Das Märchen der Märchen, Pohádka pohádek, Lugude lugu, Itsuka monogatari, Tale of tales, Le conte des contes, Il racconto dei racconti, O Conto dos Contos, Szörnyek és szerelmek, Tale of Tales, Priča nad pričama, Masalların Masalı, Pasaku pasaka, Baisās pasakas, Tale of tales
Runtime 2 h 14 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Once upon a time there were three neighboring kingdoms each with a magnificent castle, from which ruled kings and queens, princes and princesses. One king was a fornicating libertine, another captivated by a strange animal, while one of the queens was obsessed by her wish for a child. Sorcerers and fairies, fearsome monsters, ogres and old washerwomen, acrobats and courtesans are the protagonists of this loose interpretation of the celebrated tales of Giambattista Basile.

Top reviews

Saturday, 11 Apr 2020 03:51

The movie The Tale of Tales is a fantastic work of art and a real treat. I really have to say, that the movie is an excellent way to introduce me to Italian cinema. The film was well written and is beautifully directed by Roberto Benigni. The story is simple and straightforward. It tells about a family of creatures who are sent to another world in order to find the answers about their world and to recover a necklace that belongs to their mother. I also liked the acting of the leading actress, Angelina Jolie. She gave a very good performance and gave us a memorable movie experience. The other actors played their parts well too. I really liked the sound track of the film, it is perfectly chosen. The soundtrack was probably the most important factor for the success of the film, because it also featured a lot of popular Italian artists. I also really like the scene when Angelina Jolie looks at her family and sees a painting on the wall. I think this is a very original scene. The scene itself was really well composed and it was very expressive. The cinematography of the film is also wonderful. I really love the way the camera moves, the lens is very good. I think that the director managed to combine the beauty of the film with the elements of great camera work. I really enjoyed the atmosphere of the film. The acting was very good and they really played their roles well. The story was beautiful and original and was very entertaining and entertaining. The director managed to add some dark elements to the film and bring it out in a beautiful way. The only problem I have with this film is the ending. I was confused by it and it left me with a bad taste in my mouth. It seems like the director was trying to add something to the end and it seemed unnecessary. I really enjoyed the music of this film and I like the overall sound and atmosphere of this film. I think that this film is a real treat and a good introduction to Italian cinema. I think that this is a movie to be seen, and I really recommend it to people who are interested in Italian cinema. I really recommend you to watch this movie.
Monday, 06 Apr 2020 06:33

A childless couple named Frank (James Earl Jones) and Viola (Sigourney Weaver) move into an old mansion on a secluded island. The town has banned the missionaries from speaking with anyone, yet they hear they are welcome. The couple has three children - Shiloh (Elijah Wood) is the eldest, Della (Sarah Michelle Gellar) is the youngest, and their only daughter, Jojo (Kim Dickens) is the youngest. Frank must journey back to his family's house after the missionaries say it is forbidden to speak to them. What he doesn't know is that one of the missionaries is a devil-worshipping Christian who turns out to be a child killer and his motives are mysterious. The Good: There is a lot of good here. This is actually the best of the three movies, because it has the best of the two sub-plots: the missionaries and the devil worshipper. This is what makes this movie work. The concept of this film is interesting. It is actually a revenge story, and it works. This is something that wasn't really good in the first movie. It was almost like they threw all of the sub-plots out and replaced them with a new one, and it worked. This is a great revenge film. The story is very good. It is very well-written. I especially enjoyed the black and white scenes, because they had a lot of meaning. The Devil is played by a very great actor: Sam Raimi. He is one of the best actors in Hollywood, and his role here was absolutely awesome. He played this role with total seriousness, and it really shows. The acting is really top notch, and I can't say enough good things about the acting. The special effects are great. The scenery is good, and the atmosphere is perfect. The cinematography is great, and the setting is very eerie. The acting is also very good. The acting is the most important part of a movie, and this movie has it. The acting in this movie is really excellent, and it works. The Bad: This movie has a few problems. One is that the movie isn't as great as the second one. The acting was not as good as the first one. Also, it is very slow at times. The first one was fast-paced, and this one was slow-paced. The first one was very interesting, and this one is also very interesting. The slow-paced is what made this movie so good. The second one was also very interesting, but it is also very slow-paced. I think the third movie should have been better than this one, because this movie could have been very interesting, and the third movie is very good. There are some problems with the second one. The movie doesn't have the same quality as the first one, because the second one was very good. The third one is not as good as the first one, but it is still a good movie. There are some problems with the
Wednesday, 01 Apr 2020 01:42

In many ways this is the film that can define the whole Italian horror film movement. Many of the later film makers from the 70s and 80s attempted to replicate the early work of C.G. Jung, but this film is unique because it breaks the mould, creating a non-traditional interpretation of Jung's work, a style which is now almost lost to history. The film is said to be based on the thought of a medium with a moral dimension. The "Heaven and Earth" segments (which look a little like "The Sixth Sense" by Tom Cruise) take us back in time to the secret of the Satan's heart, while "The Devil" presents us with the origin of the Holy Trinity, and "The Devil" presents us with the nature of Satan. The director and writer have clearly defined their position in a philosophical sense, making the occult as a part of the normal world, the devil being a "supernatural" entity who is created by a sacrifice and made of flesh. This really isn't an unusual approach for the horror genre, but in this film the occult is transformed from a kind of Satanic symbol to a mysterious power which is very much at odds with the natural world. It is not just the matter of Satan being an entity created of a sacrifice and made of flesh, but that he has this inherent tendency to go against the laws of nature and cause disaster whenever he takes over the body. The philosophy of the film is very interesting and makes the occult look more spiritual than it really is. In one scene the film talks about the doctrine of the "Death of God", with a priest saying "God is dead" while a dove is floating in the air above. The viewer can see that the Christian God had a death, but the Devil had an "end" which means that he was made out of the Flesh of the flesh of the Lord. The "death of God" thesis is not unique to the film, but it is an interesting interpretation and works well with the mythology of the film. The fact that the Devil was created by a sacrifice also means that he is not really evil, but rather a fallen creature that has to be punished. The human side of the Devil is also something to take notice of. A good example of this is when a doctor from the village saves a young boy in a car accident. He explains that the Devil can create a physical being, and also how he can take on the physical form of a child, and even take on the shape of a child. In one of the climatic scenes the director plays a scene of the devil's birth. This shows the struggle of the Devil when he wants to enter the human body. One of the moral conclusions from the film is that the human being is not perfect, and that a sacrifice is necessary to get rid of the evil that has taken over the human body. This is a great message for the audience. Overall, this film is very much worth watching, because it can be viewed as an alternative to the typical Italian horror film, and
Sunday, 29 Mar 2020 20:56

My review is based on what I have read, and the lack of such reviews and similar ideas from the ones written here. I'm writing to give a serious critique on this movie, and that review is more in line with my personal feelings. I read many critics on the movie, and they all praise the story, the acting, the scenery, and so on. Those that did not like the movie were 'so-called' critics who only saw a movie for their ratings and the reviews. The movie did not perform poorly, but it certainly was not the highlight of the film. I have to admit I was disappointed with the script. This is the first movie I have ever felt like skipping. There are no jokes in it, and some of the jokes were.obviously* (for me, a good movie must have at least one joke) The movie has many flaws, but those are mainly limited to the script. One of the major things I did not like was that I did not feel much attachment to the main characters. The two main ones (Helena and May) were not developed. The movie felt like two hours of exposition. As for the other characters, they were just there. In the beginning I was not sure who they were. When Helena's character was revealed, I wanted to get rid of her and I do not regret it, but I felt she was just there for a reason. I did not get much out of the rest of the movie. This is because the movie was too long. There are only few places I feel the movie was paced well, but those are few and far between. When I was watching, I felt like the movie was dragging on a bit and not producing the same emotions as I expected. The plot was predictable, the characters not developed, and the story was boring. For those that loved the movie, this is a must watch for you. For the rest of us, it is a good movie, but not worth the hype that surrounds it. I would not recommend this to anyone, but I still suggest you go see it. I would say to the others who did not like it, I understand the reason for not liking it, and if you would like to see it, do not wait to see it on the big screen. You should see it in the cinema, because it will not work the same in a theater. I would say to all of the reviewers, read the book. You will not be disappointed.
Thursday, 26 Mar 2020 13:18

I think most of the viewers will be very surprised by this film because it contains a lot of concepts which are so taboo that I was expecting a horror film and actually a much better film. I am really grateful to the director and to the actors, because it took a lot of courage to be as brave as they were. I think that the most important thing for me is that I was really involved in the movie and I really believe in the fact that it is an artistic masterpiece. The director was also very good because he mixed artistic with philosophy and real. It is so much better than I expected from a film with such a long time since its release and it is a great honor to see that the director has been very brave in making this film. The acting was brilliant and I really feel the same way about the director. I think that this is a very important film because it shows that if you want to have a decent life then you have to have some spiritual knowledge and you have to get involved with other cultures and beliefs. The director didn't feel so much responsible for this because he also had the responsibility to create a work of art. I really appreciate that because there are so many people who can only have some idea about this and that the director didn't feel very responsible for it. I believe that the director has done a great work and the film is very beautiful. I think that it has been a very brave thing for the director to try something new, because it was very difficult to make this film because it was almost impossible to make a movie with such a long time since its release. It is also very difficult to mix art with philosophy and real. And I think that the director has done a great work. I can't stop praising the director and I can't stop praising the film because it is a masterpiece, it is very good, it is a work of art and I would love to see a different way of making a film. This is one of the greatest films of my life.

Write a review