Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver My Cousin Rachel

(16738) 6.0 106 min 2017 Subtitles and Closed Captions

My Cousin Rachel is a movie starring Rachel Weisz, Sam Claflin, and Holliday Grainger. A young Englishman plots revenge against his late cousin's mysterious, beautiful wife, believing her responsible for his death. But his feelings...

Genres
Romance, Mystery, Drama
Director
Roger Michell
Starring
Rachel Weisz, Sam Claflin, Iain Glen, Holliday Grainger

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Romance, Mystery, Drama
Director Roger Michell
Writer Daphne Du Maurier, Roger Michell
Stars Rachel Weisz, Sam Claflin, Iain Glen, Holliday Grainger
Country UK, USA
Also Known As Rachel, mu piin, Minha Prima Raquel, Meine Cousine Rachel, Verisoara mea Rachel, Rachel, Moja kuzynka Rachela, Ma cousine Rachel, Mano pussesere Reičel, Unokatestvérem, Rachel, Η εξαδέλφη μου, η Ρέητσελ, Kuzinom, Rachel, 遺孀美人心, Moja kuzynka Rachel, Mi prima Rachel, レイチェル
Runtime 1 h 46 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Ushered into an entirely male domain by the compassionate relative, Cousin Ambrose, the orphaned Philip Ashley is taken in and brought up as a true son on his guardian's estate in the rugged and wind-swept Cornwall. However, the father and son bond will shatter when the adoptive cousin who has found love and the woman of his dreams in sun-drenched Florence, dies unexpectedly, leaving Philip, who is now nearing 25, devoured by grief and a sickening suspicion of foul play. As a result, the young heir prepares to confront his protector's widow, nevertheless, utterly unprepared for the sophisticated and elegantly enigmatic woman who sweeps into his life and the family's manor. Now powerless, much to his surprise, Philip is entranced by her beguiling charm, ready to offer her the world, but is it love, wealth or freedom the beauteous Cousin Rachel yearns for?

Download romance «My Cousin Rachel»

Blu-ray
16.05 GB
DVD
5.25 GB
Windows
5.35 GB
MacOS
7.2 GB
MKV
5.5 GB
MP4
5.38 GB
H.264
5.95 GB
H.265
5.38 GB
AVI
3.18 GB
MOV
6.77 GB
DivX
7.58 GB

Customers who watched drama «My Cousin Rachel» also watched

  1. Ying
    Ying
  2. Fiddler: A Miracle of Miracles Available on Prime
    Fiddler: A Miracle of Miracles
  3. The Little Stranger
    The Little Stranger
  4. Ridge Runners Available on Prime
    Ridge Runners
  5. La flor
    La flor
  6. A Small Good Thing Available on Prime
    A Small Good Thing
  7. Rock On 2
    Rock On 2
  8. Officer Downe Available on Prime
    Officer Downe
  9. Sudden Fear
    Sudden Fear
  10. La camarista Available on Prime
    La camarista
  11. In Loco Parentis
    In Loco Parentis
  12. Patriots Day Available on Prime
    Patriots Day
  13. Dough
    Dough
  14. Inferno Available on Prime
    Inferno
  15. Dora and the Lost City of Gold
    Dora and the Lost City of Gold

24 customer reviews about mystery «My Cousin Rachel»

3 out of 5 stars 3 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Edward M.
Wednesday, 15 Jul 2020 23:01

I can't help but compare this movie to the play where it is set. In the play it is the one that Oliver Stone and his writing partner Irving Klaw teamed up to do. It is a story about a young man who has to learn to be the person he is meant to be. He is kind of a loner. He lives alone and has to start accepting responsibility for himself. It is a rather unique set up. In this movie, that story is expanded into a bigger and bigger story. There is not much to say. It is a good movie but it is nothing spectacular. I thought the actor's were very good. The wife played by Reese Witherspoon was wonderful and so was the father played by Dennis Quaid. He was the best of the lot and was believable. The rest of the cast did a good job. I was very impressed with Joseph Fiennes as Harvey Keitel. He was very good at playing a loner who had to go through the trouble of learning to be who he wanted to be. So I can't say he was the best but he was quite good. Emma Thompson was decent. I thought she played a somewhat disappointing character. But her character was interesting and the story was very well written. The cinematography was good and I felt like it was done very well. But it was still a good movie but nothing great.
John P.
Wednesday, 15 Jul 2020 17:04

I was first drawn to this film by an excellent review by The Atlantic. There were few redeeming qualities to the film, but the best of these was the performance of Scarlett Johansson. A professional actress of virtually no talent whatsoever, she brings a sensitivity and humanity to her role that I have not seen in a film before. She is truly believable. And her acting is the only reason to see this film. I really do think this film should have been rated PG for that reason alone. There are several scenes in which the camera moves almost over the top of her face. I felt that was unnecessary. At one point in the movie, the scene where she sees the dead children in the graveyard and sees a knife sticking out of the grave, is done in such a way as to make the viewer think the knife has already pierced through her eye. That's a little close for my taste. It would have been better to leave this scene in the editing room and just have a scene that was not so heavily edited. There were other scenes where the camera would not be in view for a few seconds at a time. But that's really the only real detractor to the film. I didn't think the film was bad. I did think it was average. I thought the story could have been better. I think it was better in the hands of an experienced director. I also think the best thing that could have been done for this film is to not have the main character be a professional actress. I think people in their twenties would not have handled this film as well as they could have. But in the hands of a more experienced director, it could have been something special. I would be more comfortable watching this film if it were an experienced director. I thought the film was good but not great. I rated this film 7/10.
Grace
Monday, 13 Jul 2020 08:07

This is a fascinating and moving film that stays with you long after you've seen it. The plot is well laid out and the performances are great, especially from Paul Giamatti, who is particularly good. The direction is exceptional. The photography is truly excellent, and the music is very haunting. There are some very subtle moments in this film that are quite disturbing. The story is well structured, and you are never bored. It is also very hard to believe that this is actually true. The ending is chilling. All in all, this is a movie worth watching.
Roger Hoffman
Monday, 13 Jul 2020 02:19

What else could be said about a movie about a girl that is about to get married to a boy and when he finds out she is pregnant it goes all out and is handled in a way that gives us the feeling that we can feel the film. Jennifer Lopez is the main character and she does very well but she's just not a role for her. She's not a leading lady. But she does all the acting and she does it well. A lot of the film is set in Paris and it's great and I've never seen a film in that city that is as real as it is in Paris. The whole film is set in Paris. The locations are pretty good, but there isn't anything very special about it. But they do well to make the film watchable. I have never seen so much sex in a film before. It's great. It's not in the movie for very long, but when it is it's great. The film has a little romance and it's a little awkward, but it's great. I love the film and I think it's one of those films you can watch several times. If you don't like it you can always go see the video or see it on the big screen and it will be the same. I recommend this film.
Albert Chen
Thursday, 09 Jul 2020 09:54

I'm a fan of Burt Reynolds. His performances are good, even though I can't stand his accent, as it makes it hard for me to understand the dialogue. This movie is excellent for him. I have seen this movie several times and every time I'm convinced that I saw the same movie. Burt Reynolds plays a doctor who lost his wife in a car accident. He has been divorced since. He's trying to have a relationship with his daughter Rachel (Jennifer Connelly). Rachel comes to visit. Rachel knows that Burt Reynolds' ex wife has been seeing another man. Rachel has no idea what's going on with Burt Reynolds, but she makes the connection that the ex-wife is seeing another man. He doesn't know about this at first. This could be a dysfunctional family. However, after a few days Burt Reynolds begins to change. He is not satisfied with the life he's living and starts looking for a new life for himself. The story is about a man who can't quite find what he feels for his family. He is married to another woman. He feels sorry for himself and starts trying to get to know his daughter. Burt Reynolds is very good in this movie. Jennifer Connelly is a perfect cast for Rachel. She is a good actress. She makes this movie. She has a good relationship with Burt Reynolds. It's a good story and a good script. This movie is very good.
Christina A.
Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 10:50

A lot of people will criticize this film because they think that the twists in the film are pretty gimmicky and hard to follow. However, the films main point is that it's a love story. I also think that the film doesn't really delve into the origin of Stephen, but rather focuses more on how Rachel and Stephen became like-minded. Both of them aren't necessarily on a wrong path, but they were in it together. I do agree with the first critique about the film being so busy at the beginning. However, in the end, I think that the film is very easy to follow, and if you watch it, you will understand what was happening. Rachel gets extremely involved in the film and it's quite an interesting experience watching how her mind works. I highly recommend this film to anyone who wants to watch a film about someone who becomes in love.
Lori Dean
Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 09:20

At first glance, this film seems like it would be nothing more than another garbage film from B movie mega-star, Anthony Hopkins, (who has done some of the worst films of all time, like the crazy, predictable sci-fi murder mysteries, and Memento). But I was pleasantly surprised by the film. The acting is fantastic, and I must say, the photography, costume design and even the original music that the film was shot with is simply stunning. The story is nothing special, but it isn't bad. It just needs some work. I understand that the film didn't turn out like the studio had planned it, and even the climax was too much. But I give this film a 7 out of 10 stars.
Bobby L.
Tuesday, 23 Jun 2020 05:19

I'm really surprised that the few people who didn't like this film gave it the "0" rating. A lot of the scenes are unrealistic but the acting and the story are so good that it doesn't matter. The whole plot is complex but that doesn't matter either. If you want to see a film that takes you by surprise then see this film. You will not be disappointed. And the scene with the suitcase that Rachel and her sister made is so eerie and sad. It's so good that you have to see it in the theater. The only negative comment I have is that there are many scenes where the older version is shown. In fact the younger version is better than this one. I have seen the older version in the theater and I always leave the room after the older version was shown. I think the older version is a better choice if you have trouble sleeping.
Bryan Lawson
Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 21:01

This is a good movie. The plot is OK and the acting is great. This is about a young girl who goes to the hospital with a severe head injury. The head injuries don't seem that severe and after an emergency, she is treated with water, cranial ice, etc. But she ends up being asleep for some time and the doctors find out that she has a neurotic personality, she may be a masochist and is seriously depressed. So the movie is a little sad and disappointing. But overall it is good. I would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a good drama. The story is OK, but I have seen a better movie about a little girl with a head injury.
Cynthia S.
Sunday, 07 Jun 2020 00:35

This is a nice movie with a nice twist on what happens to teenagers and what they do in high school. I'm sure most people will enjoy this movie more than me. There are some sad parts in the movie but it's still a really good movie. The movie has been reviewed here as kind of a romance and boy meets girl. While I thought it was like that, the movie does go farther than that. For one, in a way, the movie is more of a thriller as well as a character study. The movie really explores the effect that having to study so much of it can have on people and how the life of a teenager in high school plays out for some of the people. It does show how different girls are with different personalities, making it even more interesting. The relationship between Gavin and Rachel is very good. It's hard to predict what the relationship between Gavin and Rachel will be like but it's still interesting and one of the better parts of the movie. This movie does have some problems in the movie that keep it from being really good but still a good movie. One of the biggest problems in this movie is the film looks cheap. Even though the movie looks good, the scenes are way too long. One scene in the movie, for example, takes almost two whole hours and it just went on and on. Another big problem is the ending. It was very weird and didn't make much sense. Another problem is that the music of the movie is quite boring. The songs don't really fit with the movie and even though I like the song "Love Will Keep Us Together" a lot, I would say it's not really a good song. In conclusion, I think this is a really good movie with a good plot, great characters, great actors and it's got a very good ending. It's not the best movie but it's not really that bad either. 7/10
Daniel
Thursday, 04 Jun 2020 15:38

I went into this movie expecting a disaster. As someone who regularly watches movies on Netflix and somehow ended up on this one, I felt completely misled into thinking it was the scariest movie I've ever seen. When I walked out of the theater I thought I knew exactly what I'd seen. The movie was boring, the plot was cliche, and it was all over-blown. I didn't care about any of the characters, and the movie was filled with plot holes. I got a lot of enjoyment out of watching this movie. If you want to see a good movie that is fun and well-acted, check out Step Up. If you want to be scared, watch any horror film.
Sara Jensen
Wednesday, 03 Jun 2020 08:19

A mother's fight for survival and the war with drug trafficking is what caused the downfall of a major drug cartel. In doing so, the mother died. The boy still has to rely on his older brother for love and survival. He works for the warlord in prison and finds himself in a dangerous situation. I saw this movie at the 2007 San Francisco International Film Festival and it was the best movie I've seen since Chita and Sam, both of which were made the year before. It made me think about the history of the movie and why the war was so great. It gave me a sense of what this film was really about. The only downside to this movie was that it took awhile to get going. I think this was more of a character study than a war movie. Overall, this was a good movie. I give it a B+.
Judy
Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 00:52

As a big fan of "The Constant Gardener," I decided to buy the DVD of this film. After viewing it, I was greatly disappointed. The film starts out with an obvious commentary on the current state of affairs, then veers off into a more traditional story of love and death, with a twist. The characters are all well drawn, the plot is somewhat developed, and the scenes are sometimes beautiful. However, this story is not credible. I can't believe it would be possible to produce a story like this and then have the main characters all be gay. I can't believe it would be a good thing to include gay themes into a movie like this. It seems to me like the filmmakers were trying to make a statement about homosexuality, but were not sure how to express it. I can't imagine that any person who is gay would be interested in this film. In my opinion, it's not even worth viewing for those who are familiar with the original story. I can't believe that this film is so well-received, especially by people who are not familiar with it. This is really one of those films that I don't recommend to people who aren't familiar with the original story.
Betty V.
Thursday, 28 May 2020 08:58

The movie I liked the most was most probably Ode To Judy Garland, and most probably Lost Highway. These movies are maybe the only movies that I have ever seen that were really good, and this one is definitely in that top tier. I like the fact that it's very poetic, and not to be taken too seriously. The music, and cinematography were great, and I also really liked the fact that the film-makers have not been afraid to show how the real-life happened, and also the fact that it was a relatively small budget film, I am also glad to see that the plot is very well developed, although the ending is kind of a letdown, I think. Overall, the movie is pretty good, but not amazing.
Jane
Wednesday, 27 May 2020 13:25

I remember the title of this film from the movie which the film is based on, not the film itself. I am a fan of this film and have watched it many times. It is a beautiful film and the only thing that I can think of that is really bad about it is the acting. It was like watching a bad soap opera. The casting was actually pretty good. I thought most of the actors did an excellent job and the film has a great storyline that is actually rather realistic. I also like the ending. I was hoping for something more dramatic. I felt like the ending was too optimistic and was not as satisfying as I had hoped. I think it should have ended a bit more dramatic than it did. This film has had a great impact on me. I recommend it.
Tiffany Barrett
Wednesday, 20 May 2020 12:33

This movie has been the cause of many debates over the years, what it is, what it is not and why it is so highly-rated. The critics have been extremely critical of it, comparing it unfavorably to movies like "Naked", "The Shining", "Repulsion" and "Psycho". If you were to compare it to any other movie, you'd be hard-pressed to do so. "Fletch" is the quintessential American crime movie, it is a cerebral movie, and at times it is rather dull. It is a tough one to appreciate, but once you see the movie you may enjoy it more. To me it is like a classic film noir, but with the style of a 1960s British film noir. It is a slow moving, semi-suspenseful film with few thrills. I remember, I saw it when it came out and I loved it. I liked it very much, and I still like it. I don't really find it a great movie, and I'm not a big fan of it, but I do like it. I like that it is a 'serious' crime film. There is some good acting, and it is a little overrated. It is also quite nice to look at. The direction is simple and not very complex, and the movie has a subdued feel to it. To me, "Fletch" is a simple noir about a quiet American whose big family is destroyed by the greed of a police officer who owns a little white-trash hideout. The movie is slow to start, but as the mystery unravels, it becomes a very strong, dark, psychological movie. It also has a lot of that '40s British style, with slow-mo and dark lighting. It is very good. I can't really say much about the plot, but it is a bit like a Hitchcock film. The movie has a strange vibe to it. It is very cerebral, and a very quiet movie. The characters are all complex, but all of them are well-acted, and they all play their parts well. I was not a big fan of Ben Gazzara's performance, but I did like it. I give this movie a 7 out of 10. "Fletch" is a film that doesn't make any big statements. It is the kind of movie that you can watch once and forget it, but it still has it's effect on you. The movie is very cerebral, and there is a lot of good acting. This is not a 'fun' movie. "Fletch" is a very good film, but it is not one that I would rate highly. There are many excellent movies that are far better. See "Fletch" if you can, but I wouldn't take it as your favorite. Watch "Naked" instead.
James Weber
Tuesday, 19 May 2020 11:03

I just watched "Cousin Rachel", and it was very slow, but I didn't feel like I wasted too much time. As much as I liked Rachel, the writing was poor, and the characters were predictable. Still, I found this movie to be entertaining and well worth seeing. I liked the sound effects, they were well done, and I found the scenery to be quite lovely. This movie made me think, it was like a French film. The acting was good, the story line was slow, but this movie is worth seeing. I rate this movie 7/10.
Eric F.
Tuesday, 19 May 2020 05:06

I've seen the movie 'Cousin Rachel' and I must say that I enjoyed it. I also enjoyed the fact that they had also spent a lot of time focusing on the actual relationships of the four people involved, as opposed to the romantic side of things. Of course there are certain aspects that the movie would have liked to have focused more on but ultimately I think it was the right decision. What I also liked about this film was that the film had a good amount of comedy. If you're looking for a movie that has a lot of blood and gore, this isn't it. This movie is more of a character study, and it definitely had a good amount of that too. I really enjoyed the fact that this movie showed the friendship of two people who actually did care about each other. I also liked the fact that this movie showed that sometimes you just have to know what to do to get along with people, even if that means breaking your own family code. Overall, this movie definitely had its ups and downs, but it certainly wasn't the movie that I was hoping to see. But, like I said, I think that it was the right choice.
Keith Schultz
Monday, 18 May 2020 03:36

In the aftermath of the assassination of President Kennedy, newspapers and TV networks rush to tell us the whole story, and Americans are outraged at the injustice of it all. Cid (John Cusack) is a California writer living in the San Fernando Valley with his wife Rosemary (Kate Beckinsale). Their children Ben (Chase Dickinson) and Catherine (Mia Farrow) live in the upper-middle class. The family of old friends and neighbors, such as Henry Darrow (Alan Arkin), Gus (Gary Dauberman) and Harry (Dave Foley) shows up. They all have an interesting and interesting history that most of the characters don't know about. However, one of the younger people, Seth Allen (Harry Treadaway), mentions the name of his deceased father, Arthur Allen, who was a lawyer at the University of Southern California. Cid and Rosemary become obsessed with finding out what happened to their father. They begin a research project to find out, but not everyone is as skeptical as Cid. The end is about Cid's girlfriend's (Celia Imrie) death. Cid and Rosemary also learn that they were married for only two months, but she claimed to be 35 and he was about 45. Cid and Rosemary become friends, and the problem is that Rosemary is married with two children and is extremely close to Cid. Meanwhile, Cid has a secret that he shares with his wife and her friends. The film is slow-moving, and the audience can't wait to get the full story. It takes about an hour and a half to tell the story. The cast is great. John Cusack is Cid, but he's not the star of the movie. The film is full of outstanding performances. Mia Farrow, Alan Arkin, Dave Foley, Janeane Garofalo, Emma Thompson, Robert Downey, Jr., Vera Farmiga, Eddie Redmayne, Jake Busey, J.K. Simmons, Nick Offerman, Rachel Bilson, and Daniel Craig are all in the cast. Cid and Rosemary are the main characters, and the film should have been called, "How to Kill a Brother & Sister."
Joyce C.
Sunday, 17 May 2020 21:48

It's a good movie. Not perfect but good enough. The story is about a sister and her sons. She tries to seduce them and is faithful to her brothers. She is successful and then it is time for the ending. I think it is a good ending. There are flaws with it. The acting is okay but not amazing. As for the story. I am not the most talented director so I can't talk about the story. But it is a good movie. The best part is that the director kept the romance with the brother. The other part is the ending. It is awesome.
Jordan
Friday, 15 May 2020 12:50

Saw this film in 3D last night, and I loved it. It was actually much better than I thought it would be. So much more dialogue and story, and it kept me engaged throughout the entire film. I really liked the music, which is really really sad, but not at all depressing. It just really well complements the film, and was very clever. Definitely recommended. Love to hear a female protagonist in a film, it never hurts! But this movie had great performances, especially from the 2 leads. The kids are great, especially Jude Law and Rachel Weisz. I would recommend this film to anyone.
Christopher W.
Saturday, 09 May 2020 19:26

The premise of this film is that "three friends" went to India to 'study' and in the process meet up with another 'friend', which "occurs" as one of the guys goes off to 'prepare for life' and one of the girls - a fashion designer - returns. But her family is not happy about this so she decides to move to Europe and start her own business. But her father (played by Sam Neill) is suspicious of her sudden departure and enforces her to return to the States. This film is a bit overlong, the beginning is a bit predictable, and the romance is predictable. And the 'intervention' scene is nothing more than a weak plot device. The film does have some quirky moments, including the movie showing some famous Indian culture while editing. But for me it's not worth watching, despite its popularity.
Terry
Friday, 24 Apr 2020 11:26

First off, let me say that I'm very much a fan of Angela Lansbury, and I think she was wonderful in the movie, even if her character was pretty cliched and predictable. The movie itself was definitely over-the-top and made me laugh, as many people have said, but the thing is that at the end I still found it very good. I think the real problem with the movie, to me, is that I can't get the general plot out of my head, and I'd have to watch it again to fully appreciate what the characters had to say and what their purpose was, which I think is what the film should have been all about. The message of the film seems to be that it's OK to just try something new, and be different, and that's the only way we should ever be able to escape from our lives and actually grow as people. I think that's just very unrealistic. What Angela Lansbury's character tries to do in the film is not necessarily new, but it's one that I found to be interesting, and I don't think it was the case in real life. I do agree with the above reviews though, the acting and directing were great, and I think it's a very important film to watch if you're a fan of Angela Lansbury. I hope they make a sequel!
Elizabeth Woods
Friday, 24 Apr 2020 09:03

As I do with all of Kubrick's films, I had high expectations with this one, especially after seeing the trailer for it and reading some of the reviews. Although the trailer gave me the impression that it would be one of the classic films of the 70's, it actually wasn't that way. In my opinion, this film had some plot holes, which was annoying. Most of the time I found it hard to tell who was who or why certain characters were acting the way they were. I have to admit that I did not like this film that much, but I would probably not recommend this to someone who is expecting a classic film. I found the film quite boring, the story line was very weak, and it could have been a little bit better. Although it was good in the beginning, it eventually lost it's touch. There was not much action and the story was somewhat predictable. This film could have been a lot better had it been more action oriented. Also, the ending could have been better as well.
See all 24 reviews
 Write a review