Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Uncertain

(260) 7.1 82 min 2015 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Uncertain is a visually stunning and disarmingly funny portrait of the literal and figurative troubled waters of Uncertain, Texas, a 94-resident town so tucked away "you've got to be lost to find it".

Genres
Documentary, Comedy, Drama
Director
Ewan McNicol, Anna Sandilands

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Documentary, Comedy, Drama
Director Ewan McNicol, Anna Sandilands
Writer Anna Sandilands, Ewan McNicol
Country USA
Also Known As Kesin gibi
Runtime 1 h 22 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K

Download documentary «Uncertain»

Blu-ray
15.81 GB
DVD
5.01 GB
Windows
5.11 GB
MacOS
6.96 GB
MKV
5.26 GB
MP4
5.14 GB
H.264
5.71 GB
H.265
5.14 GB
AVI
2.94 GB
MOV
6.53 GB
DivX
7.34 GB

Customers who watched drama «Uncertain» also watched

  1. Ben Is Back
    Ben Is Back
  2. Un sac de billes Available on Prime
    Un sac de billes
  3. The Peacemaker
    The Peacemaker
  4. I Am Not Your Negro Available on Prime
    I Am Not Your Negro
  5. Sembene!
    Sembene!
  6. Le grand méchant renard et autres contes... Available on Prime
    Le grand méchant renard et autres contes...
  7. Swim Team
    Swim Team
  8. Spa Night Available on Prime
    Spa Night
  9. Sweet Virginia
    Sweet Virginia
  10. To Joey, with Love Available on Prime
    To Joey, with Love
  11. Kkun
    Kkun
  12. Siganitalja Available on Prime
    Siganitalja
  13. Oh Lucy!
    Oh Lucy!
  14. Den of Thieves Available on Prime
    Den of Thieves
  15. La disparition des lucioles
    La disparition des lucioles

20 customer reviews about comedy «Uncertain»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Michael L.
Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 12:15

Wow. This is one of those films that all can be so different and yet so the same. I had a couple of issues with it, but all in all, I enjoyed it and the film makers did a good job of presenting it. I am a big fan of Tim Robbins and was expecting some kind of real life inspiration to him, but I got a lot more. His story is not new, but the way he is telling it is very interesting. It is well worth the watch and I am sure you will like it as well.
Lisa
Monday, 20 Jul 2020 04:48

In this documentary about the film about Della Vedova's life, Jochen Gierke, director of "Deceived", tries to make us see that the reasons why we should admire Della Vedova are the same reasons we admire ourselves: She had a unique way of thinking, not to know what is going to happen next, to be open to what her life is going to be like, she knew herself, she knew what she loved, and she knew how to act in the world. "The Greatest Moments in History" attempts to tell us the same thing. It's full of clips from the real life of Della Vedova, a famous Austrian actress who is now in her seventies. The footage is so interesting that the film never even gets boring. There are also beautiful pictures of Della Vedova, her friends, her family, and the director. The only problem is that we can't really see Della Vedova as she really was. There are some parts of the film that seem to be taken from Della Vedova's real life, and it is still very difficult to believe that she was doing that. But if we can get past that, then we might get to know something about the girl herself. The film is very well made and I really enjoyed it. It would have been much better if Della Vedova herself had made the film, because then we would have had a true portrait of the actress.
Susan H.
Monday, 13 Jul 2020 09:53

I recently saw this film at the New York Film Festival. I was so impressed, I decided to write a review. I saw "Erin Brockovich" and was extremely disappointed. "Erin Brockovich" had a good premise, great chemistry between the main characters, and was also very entertaining. "The Urbans", however, had some interesting characters, but they didn't really get to interact. This film was also a little bit overlong. I also noticed that the film seemed to have a lot of symbolism. For instance, in one scene, the main character, Molly McElfresh, talks about "When we are not touching." Another scene I noticed was in which the main character explains to her husband, "A woman is a woman only when she has a child." Another interesting aspect of this film was the use of real people in the film. I would have liked to see a more realistic portrayal of the people involved in this film. If you are looking for a film that is completely entertaining, this is not it. If you are looking for a film that will make you think and/or change you as a person, then this is your film.
Douglas C.
Sunday, 12 Jul 2020 14:19

This documentary has a few good points, but more than anything else, the movie is a bit of a mess. I mean, does anyone really know what it's about? The stories are scattered, and there's no sense of consistency in them. I didn't understand all the reasons the people died, even if they were all apparently nice. Maybe it's because the documentary is so chaotic, that I didn't care about the characters. Maybe it's the way it's filmed. Maybe it's the fact that it's such a mess. Maybe it's just because it was made by none of the people involved.
Sara Cunningham
Tuesday, 23 Jun 2020 12:54

When I first heard about this film, I thought it would be another boring documentary about video games. But after I saw it, I realized that this is an interesting film. It shows the true costs of creating a video game. The movie is extremely funny and explains the problems that people face in creating a game. It also shows how companies have to push the limits of their creativity and how people create games with low-quality gameplay. I have to say that I did enjoy this film, but it was not great, but it was good. It shows how people struggle to create good games, but also how people try to make video games that are better than the game that they are playing. Overall, this is an interesting and entertaining film. If you like this film, then you will definitely enjoy this documentary.
Ethan H.
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 20:38

As a budding film-maker, I had always felt that documentary film-making is only valuable if you understand the culture. Not having known any of the guys on this show, I really had no idea what this documentary was about, but it was interesting enough to keep me engaged. I have seen other documentaries about this group that were far more detailed, but it really does nothing to reveal what the people on the show are like outside of their work on this show. For that, you really need to have knowledge of the subject matter. This documentary didn't go into much detail into the people's backgrounds, but it did a good job at showing the effect that their work had on people's lives. I think it was important that they showed the interviewees for the most part being genuine and real people, rather than just making them look like they are good friends. That was good, but it could have been done a little better. This documentary does show some of the guys' real problems and gives you a sense of how they are dealing with them. The other thing I found interesting about this documentary was that it gave you a sense of the pressures these guys have to deal with to get that film made, and how that sometimes affects the way they see themselves and how they perceive other people. Also, the interviewees did an excellent job of making it feel like they were all friends, but they really were. It's good to see that they were all in good terms with each other, which is rare, but at the same time, it's very difficult to get everyone in a film to like each other. In the end, this documentary is very good, and it will definitely keep you interested. I would recommend it, but I'm not sure how I would really recommend it.
Carol Tucker
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 14:41

This is a documentary-documentary about the intersection of real estate and the criminal justice system. It examines the very common and very, very difficult issue of property speculation and whether it's a good thing or a bad thing for the criminal justice system. It examines the growing trend in recent years of investing in real estate to help finance criminal justice programs in their communities. It is particularly interested in the practice of real estate investing and the differing opinions of both the pros and cons of the practice. In addition, it also addresses the problematic practice of incarcerating people for what they think they are innocent of. The documentary is very much a must see, not just for those who believe in real estate speculation, but for anyone who has ever been arrested or for whom something like real estate investment can be an issue.
Brian
Monday, 15 Jun 2020 10:32

I had this movie shown at a screening of CineTv.com and I'm just a bit perplexed. The movies that this movie tries to connect is better left to the original. Though I could not see the concept, it was rather entertaining and smart. I'm not going to get into too much detail here but just know that this movie has more potential than you can ever think. One of my favorite movies of all time is "The Usual Suspects". The reason I say that is because I saw it for the first time when I was about 12 years old and I loved it. Now, in 2013, I'm almost 50 and I really do enjoy movies that are more thought out. There are movies like "Fever Pitch" and "Citizen Cane" that are better and more thought out. If you're looking for a movie to entertain you, and not to take too much of your mind, this is the movie to watch.
Pamela
Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 03:13

It is only natural that I would not like this film. But if I had to choose, I would say it is more a work of art than a documentary. Why? Because the documentary style that is so prevalent in this film makes it impossible to watch it as a film. There is no shot or sound that could work to the film's advantage. I realize this sounds so negative, but it is my opinion that a film that is not a documentary should not be considered a documentary. In fact, you can cut the documentary style from the film in half and there still wouldn't be a film. If the documentary style were cut, the film would be more a work of art. It has the feel of a documentary and that is a true testament to how it could be done.
Peter Gray
Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 12:19

When I first heard about this film, I knew it was a documentary about the apartheid era. I didn't know what to expect, but I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. Although the film is quite dark, the themes are uplifting. I particularly liked the way the filmmaker spoke to the audience about the positive sides of apartheid. I also enjoyed the way the filmmakers focused on the apartheid era and avoided comparisons to other eras. The movie really is a series of interviews with a variety of people and their experiences with the regime. This made the film much more unique and insightful than I had expected. I enjoyed the film and would recommend it to anyone who wants to know about the apartheid era. Overall, it is a good movie that is important to all people of all races.
Doris Holland
Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 05:01

This film is a collection of clips from The Beatles' career that are recorded on tape during the band's California residency at the time. The director, Mr. Obrez, walks the audience through the experience of being a Beatle fan. He doesn't show the bands' live performances and clips are presented instead. He presents clips from the concerts where the band performed, and interviews of people who were in the audience when the band played. When the film was over, I was left with the feeling that Mr. Obrez wanted to present a documentary, but not a concert film. There were several scenes that left me feeling that he was too interested in the actual concert footage, instead of focusing on the music. This left me wanting more about the actual concert footage. Mr. Obrez also shows clips from the first five albums of the Beatles and presents a very anti-climactic explanation of the reason why the Beatles came to be in the shape they did. I didn't see the Beatles' popularity at this point as a great driving force for the band, but a product of the stage production. However, I did like that Mr. Obrez did not portray the Beatles as any more than a rock group. He did a good job of showing the Beatles' extreme popularity, but he did not give them any "cartoonish" qualities. On the other hand, I was disappointed with the lack of an introduction to the Beatles and the lack of interviews with any of them. The focus of the film is on the music and the legendary concert footage. It would have been better to focus on the fans themselves, not just the band.
Janice L.
Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 00:51

I had never heard of this film until someone told me about it on TBS. I never knew the story, so I was interested in seeing what was happening, but I was not really looking for a documentary. The first 30 minutes of the film didn't make much sense. I know people who've been through this process, so it's not a total waste of time. The film itself, however, was pretty interesting. I watched the film in 3-D, and I found the 3-D to be interesting. I've never really liked 3-D, but I really liked it in this film. It gave me a completely different perspective on the film, which helped me get over the "I have no idea what's going on" feeling I got from many of the others. This is one of the better films I've seen recently. It's not a high-budget film, but it's an interesting one. I really like it, and I hope it gets released on DVD, as it's not really worth it in terms of video. I'm glad I saw it.
Beverly Alvarez
Saturday, 23 May 2020 16:59

In a documentary that is fascinating and sometimes funny at the same time, Rob Marshall and Jack O'Connell portray the challenge of making a documentary about our rights and the problems with our criminal justice system in America. The history and the current events in this documentary are quite interesting, but the discussion of the current problems and the lack of future for this documentary is questionable. The most of the film was taken from news clips. Even though there were news clips, the clips were pretty long and difficult to understand. There were times when I thought it was a long documentary, but the interviewees, many of whom had changed their views on these issues over time, made it seem much shorter. Also, many of the clips were from the press, the so-called "independent" press, which was not much of an industry back then. There were also numerous news clips of celebrities and other news organizations, who were in fact more interested in their own benefit than the viewers. Also, the decision to show the interviewees in their prison uniforms, rather than the norm of showing them in their own clothes, made it seem like they were doing something for the cameras. This was an interesting documentary that should have been much longer. However, I found the discussion of the current problems in the criminal justice system was a little heavy-handed. It was quite interesting to hear the current and past views of the judges and attorneys involved, but they did not feel the need to go into the political problems that each of them had. We are here to discuss the current problems in a documentary, not the political problems of which each of them had knowledge. I think the length of the documentary was an unfortunate thing, and I think it could have been done a little more with a little more insight into the current problems and the difficulties of making a documentary.
Justin W.
Friday, 15 May 2020 14:37

Saw this at the NYFF, and was pleasantly surprised by the film. While I won't deny it's limitations, it's a highly entertaining, if somewhat complex and intense, film. The interplay of the different story lines is a very effective tool for the film to take it's time and develop. The end result is a very well done piece of art. On the flip side, this movie was a bit too technical for my taste. If I had to make an analogy of this film, I would say it's a bit like the documentary "The War on Poverty" that is the subject of this film. While both films are quite good, one is an incredibly detailed look at a very complex issue and the other is a simplified look at a very specific problem. Both have a lot to say, and that is what I was trying to get out of this film. I found myself thinking about both films after it was over. This film was definitely a cut above the other ones I've seen in the past year. It was a very enjoyable movie, and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to learn a little bit more about the issues and then decide for themselves what they think. If you want to know the facts about gun violence, then you'll like this film. If you want to learn more about the issue and decide for yourself what you think, then you'll like this film. It was a good film, but one that may not be to everyone's taste.
Amy
Thursday, 14 May 2020 13:06

For as long as I can remember, "unknowns" have always been just that. People with no clue as to who they are. What was it about, what was it about, and how did they get there. While this documentary on Edward Tufte is unique, it is still very much a small part of the overall view of this film. It is an intimate look at one man's journey to complete one of the greatest works of art ever created. At the end of the day, this film is a look at a human being's journey and how art is different from their daily life. I am of course referring to Edward Tufte, the man who created the greatest art known in human history. His approach to art is always different from anyone else's. His masterpiece "A Mathematical Method for the Analysis of Comic Books" has been hailed as a genius by his peers, his critics and even the people who made the film. Tufte is not as much known as his contemporaries, and that is why it is important to watch his films. After all, what was it about, what was it about, and how did they get there. I do not think I can say enough about this film, it has my best wishes for the future.
Johnny S.
Sunday, 10 May 2020 08:57

When I came to this documentary I was unaware of this film. The film really does tell the truth. I have a pretty open mind about how things are done in Israel and the Palestinians. I know a little about the civil war that took place in Gaza, and I know it was a very sad time in the history of the Jewish people. But this is really a window into the human race. A man was shot and killed because he was suspected of being a Jew. But what happens when that is not the case? Is that person considered a terrorist, or just a murderer? What is the responsibility of the people who are taking this person's life? And how much responsibility does the other person have? The fact that there are so many stories that go on in Gaza and in Israel, and yet so little attention is given to the civilians in both of those countries, makes me think that something is not being told here. I am not a fan of either side, and there are a lot of things that I think are wrong with the way the Palestinians are treated in Israel. But I am certainly not a fan of the way they are treated in Gaza. The film is informative and well-made, and shows the human side of the conflict in a very honest way. I would not recommend it to people who are not against either side, but it is a good film and it should be shown on TV as soon as possible.
Janice
Thursday, 23 Apr 2020 06:07

I went into this film expecting to see some great insight into the life of Jim Morrison. I was wrong. For all the attention given to his entire life and the opportunities he was denied, the film gave no insight into the relationship between his parents or his mother. The film did not even attempt to tell the story of Jim Morrison's suicide. Instead, it made a point of telling his suicide and his music. The focus of the film is Jim Morrison's drug addiction, which was the subject of a recent documentary. The film is intriguing because it takes the time to focus on the life and music of Jim Morrison, but it fails to do anything with it. The music that the film makes mention of in the beginning of the film is the music that Morrison himself wrote and recorded. The film does not even talk about Jim Morrison's relationship with his father, who was not even mentioned in the film. This is not to say that the film is bad. I enjoyed the interviews that were given. I thought the film did a great job of telling the story of Jim Morrison. However, this film does not tell the story of his life. I thought it would be good, but I will not be giving it a 9 or 10.
Russell Peterson
Thursday, 23 Apr 2020 03:32

Very inspiring documentary that I found very informative. I don't understand why there is a lack of words. I am very interested in the dialogue between the author, Bruce Bettman, and the women, Ruth Shaver and Amy Piscitelli, who are her co-writers. Both are strong and independent women who are able to express their opinions in a way that I haven't seen in documentaries for some time. I also love the diverse individuals they interviewed and in particular the star-studded cast, including Frances McDormand, Michael Douglas, Mary Steenburgen, and Renee Zellweger. I'm curious to see their next documentary.
Gregory
Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 21:43

The director, an American from Detroit, delivers a compelling and excellent account of what has been called "a battle of the worlds". The film brings together researchers from a number of different countries and a documentary filmmaker with a Ph.D. who brought this event together and put together a great documentary on what he saw. Although the film is thorough and very well done, it is very confusing and doesn't give you a clear picture of what happened. I don't understand how this film got so many awards. I thought it was very well done, but it doesn't give you the whole picture. It would be nice to have a longer version with more detail.
Debra
Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 21:08

This movie has a lot of little bits of information that makes it enjoyable, but I'd say that it was only good to see and not understand. The fact that it's well edited makes it a good movie to watch. I did enjoy it.
See all 20 reviews
 Write a review