Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Macbeth

(51079) 6.6 113 min 2015 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Macbeth is a movie starring Michael Fassbender, Marion Cotillard, and Jack Madigan. Macbeth, the Thane of Glamis, receives a prophecy from a trio of witches that one day he will become King of Scotland. Consumed by ambition and...

Genres
War, Drama, History
Director
Justin Kurzel
Starring
Marion Cotillard, Frank Madigan, Michael Fassbender, Jack Madigan

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres War, Drama, History
Director Justin Kurzel
Writer Michael Lesslie, Jacob Koskoff, Todd Louiso, William Shakespeare
Stars Marion Cotillard, Frank Madigan, Michael Fassbender, Jack Madigan
Country USA, UK, France
Also Known As Quyên Luc Chêt, 馬克白, Macbeth: Ambição e Guerra, マクベス, Makbet, Makveth, Makbetas, Μάκβεθ, Makbets, Магбет
Runtime 1 h 53 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Macbeth, the Thane of Glamis, receives a prophecy from a trio of witches that one day he will become King of Scotland. Consumed by ambition and spurred to action by his wife, Macbeth murders his king and takes the throne for himself.

Download war «Macbeth»

Blu-ray
16.12 GB
DVD
5.32 GB
Windows
5.42 GB
MacOS
7.27 GB
MKV
5.57 GB
MP4
5.45 GB
H.264
6.02 GB
H.265
5.45 GB
AVI
3.25 GB
MOV
6.84 GB
DivX
7.65 GB

Customers who watched history «Macbeth» also watched

  1. National Theatre Live: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
    National Theatre Live: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
  2. Class Rank Available on Prime
    Class Rank
  3. The Lobster
    The Lobster
  4. Welcome to Happiness Available on Prime
    Welcome to Happiness
  5. Grâce à Dieu
    Grâce à Dieu
  6. Relève: Histoire d'une création Available on Prime
    Relève: Histoire d'une création
  7. Die Unsichtbaren
    Die Unsichtbaren
  8. The Kid Who Would Be King Available on Prime
    The Kid Who Would Be King
  9. Casablanca
    Casablanca
  10. Mastizaade Available on Prime
    Mastizaade
  11. Catching the Sun
    Catching the Sun
  12. Marjaavaan Available on Prime
    Marjaavaan
  13. Roger Waters: Us + Them
    Roger Waters: Us + Them
  14. Free Trip to Egypt Available on Prime
    Free Trip to Egypt
  15. Ex Libris: The New York Public Library
    Ex Libris: The New York Public Library

31 customer reviews about drama «Macbeth»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Amber
Thursday, 23 Jul 2020 02:51

A no-nonsense film that explores the dark side of war. This film is not as much a war film as it is a depiction of war. It also examines the meaning of life, death and forgiveness in a matter of just one man's character and family history. The film does not pretend to be a documentary or a historical document, but it is clearly a work of fiction, the creation of one man and the "love" that lives within him. As such it is interesting and somewhat unique in the world of movies, yet it is also true and tragic. The performances are great, the cinematography is amazing, the screenplay is beautiful, the music is haunting and the film is not boring. A must see.
Sandra
Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 19:24

A typical Kubrick production. The cinematography is stunning, the music is effective, and the acting is superb. In my opinion, it is one of the best movies of the 1990's.
Pamela Hayes
Saturday, 18 Jul 2020 22:42

This film is the play, based on the book, by the same name by Irvine Welsh, and the first film adaptation of the book. It is a tragic film, about the death of King Duncan in 1185, by a gunshot to the back of the head, to be exact. The script of this film, adapted from the play, is rather light-hearted, about death, but the acting and the scenery is remarkable. You can see how much it is based on a play, because of the gaudy costumes, but the costumes, especially the disguises, are really well done, in a kind of tasteful way. It is a very good film, with a great story, very touching and powerful. It has a great script, with very strong characterisation. I do not understand why this film did not get the best in Oscars, because this is really a good film. One of my favourite films of all time.
Barbara
Wednesday, 15 Jul 2020 00:29

I went to see this movie with an open mind and was blown away. The story was captivating and it was not cheesy like most movies. This movie had depth, and it was not just the fight scenes. The scenery was amazing, the acting was good, and the characters were portrayed very well. It was not just a fight film, it had a real story to it. I am glad that I went to see this movie, because I can now see why many people loved this movie. The movie is definitely not for everyone, but it will definitely have you on the edge of your seat. There is a great story to the movie, and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a great movie.
Joshua W.
Tuesday, 14 Jul 2020 19:08

I've seen this movie 3 times, and it's the same as always. There are a lot of good actors, and I liked the actors. I didn't like the scenes where the actors are eating. I thought the food was disgusting, and that they would have done better to prepare the food. I also thought the movie was too long. I didn't like that the actors were talking about how great it was to be in the war, but I think that they should have taken some time to get a little more into the characters and their relationship. I think it was too long, and I think that they could have shortened it a little bit. I also think that the movie was too long, and I think that it would have been better if they made it a little shorter. Overall, I think that it was a good movie, but I didn't like it as much as I did with the first one. It's still a good movie, but I didn't like it as much as the first one. 7/10
Lori
Monday, 13 Jul 2020 17:02

I think this film is just a little bit too long, but that is probably due to the length of the film and the fact that I am only 15 years old. I would suggest that a movie of approximately 50 minutes would be more suitable, as the actors in the movie are really good, and so is the story. I do not agree with some of the negative reviews here, but I would like to comment on those comments: Firstly, don't read the negative reviews here, they will only make you think that you don't understand the movie. Secondly, the movie is not about Shakespeare's plays, but about people, and they are all portrayed in an excellent way. I think it is the best movie of the year so far, and I am looking forward to the next one.
Sean M.
Sunday, 12 Jul 2020 04:23

I did not expect this to be as good as it was. It had a good plot, and some of the performances were decent, but it seemed to me that the movie was not that great. The first half of the movie was much better than the second half, but I could not quite understand how this could be. It was not a good movie, and I would not recommend it.
Harold S.
Thursday, 09 Jul 2020 18:50

As a movie lover and movie enthusiast I had very high expectations for this movie. I watched this movie and I must say that it really was a brilliant movie. The movie tells the story of an eccentric Scottish teacher who is both very successful and very lonely. His adventures and his lessons become so popular that he goes to many other countries. When the movie ends, you will wonder why the teacher stayed in Edinburgh and never went to Scotland. There is a lesson in this movie which you must understand. Even though Shakespeare wrote plays for the past 400 years, he did not write for the whole world. He wrote only for the people of the European countries and some parts of the world. When he wrote his plays he wanted to send the message of enlightenment and growth to all people who would read them. It is very clear that Shakespeare did not want to write for the whole world. His goal was to write for the people of Europe. If you think that I'm talking about "Julius Caesar" (1991), then you're wrong. "Julius Caesar" is not the whole world. I'm sure that the Shakespeare audience in England, France, and other parts of Europe are very different from the Shakespeare audience in America and other parts of the world. If you can't understand that, then it's very important that you read the comments on this page to see what others think about Shakespeare. In conclusion, "Macbeth" is a brilliant movie. It has the whole power of the greatest Shakespearean drama, which is "Hamlet" and the power of "Othello" and the power of "Twelfth Night" (which has some good aspects and some flaws). In this movie, we can see a realistic representation of the Catholic faith. Shakespeare is portrayed as a crazy man, who wants to show the whole world how great he is. His goal is to make all people of the world realize the truth about his work and his life. It is amazing how Shakespeare could write such a wonderful play. The plays are beautiful, the settings are beautiful, the costumes are beautiful, the acting is wonderful. You'll like this movie, but you have to have an understanding of the Shakespearean style to appreciate it. It's a masterpiece.
Jeremy G.
Wednesday, 08 Jul 2020 00:14

My first experience of a director using black and white photography was with director/writer/producer Wes Craven's horror classic "Scream", which was shot in a style similar to that of the film "Amityville Horror" and was a solid entry in the horror genre. Craven has been a big influence on the horror genre with his films such as "Halloween", "Nightmare on Elm Street" and "The Hills Have Eyes" to name a few. "Amityville Horror" has been considered one of the best horror movies ever made, and is still the most popular horror film of all time. However, the movie's style and use of black and white photography are not my favorite aspects of the film, and I can see why many people consider this movie to be "boring". The movie is set in a small town called Amityville, New York in the early 1900's, and is set during the first World War. The movie is about a young couple, played by Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton, and their daughter played by Meryl Streep, and their daughter's boyfriend, played by Patrick Wilson. In the beginning of the movie, we see the couple running around in the woods, and they get lost in the woods. They eventually run into the son of the town's mayor, played by Alan Arkin. When they get lost, they are attacked by a group of people who are all dressed in black and white. When the town's sheriff comes to town to investigate, he finds that the town is being terrorized by a group of people dressed in black and white. The movie then goes into a series of flashbacks to the couple's childhood. In the flashback, the father and mother are trying to find the town's lost boy, played by Dylan Baker, but the boy is nowhere to be found. They then go to a graveyard, where the son of the town's mayor, played by the late, great, and charismatic actor, John Carradine, is buried. When the mayor finds out about the boy, he is enraged and wants revenge. He tries to find the boy, but finds him in the graveyard. The town's mayor then kills the town's sheriff and tries to take the boy, but he is saved by the town's mayor's son, played by a young Tom Arnold. The mayor then tries to get revenge by burning the town, and he does this by blowing up the town with dynamite. The movie ends with the mayor, played by Richard Lynch, dying, and the mayor's son is about to be born. The mayor's son is a young man named Jack Nicholson. The movie is an excellent example of how to use black and white photography. The movie is a fantastic horror movie, but it's also a great example of how to use black and white photography. The movie's cinematography is excellent, and I would definitely recommend watching the movie, as it's well worth the watch. The movie's black and white photography is what makes the movie great, and I would recommend this movie to any horror fans out there. This movie is worth watching, and I would recommend watching it.
Karen Foster
Saturday, 04 Jul 2020 02:01

The last film to be released by the director of "The Lord of the Rings", Peter Jackson, "The Hobbit" is a faithful adaptation of the famous novel. It is a movie with a lot of flaws, but it is a good movie. The only thing that bothered me about the movie was that the characters were too unrealistic. The characters in the book were more than human, they were not some brainless zombies, they had feelings, motivations, and even desires. Peter Jackson does not portray the characters in the book as they are, he just makes them look like that. There are a few parts of the movie that are very difficult to understand, like the part in the end, when they show the two hobbits (the dwarfs) having a battle, and one of the hobbits gets killed. But, if you have read the book, you will understand the reason why the dwarfs attacked the dwarves. It is because the dwarves, like all humans, are human. The characters are the most important thing in a movie, and in this movie, the characters were just a bit too much unrealistic. This movie is an excellent adaptation of the book, and is definitely one of the best movies that Peter Jackson has made.
Emma V.
Wednesday, 01 Jul 2020 22:25

I haven't seen the original, so I can't compare the two, but I enjoyed this one a lot more. Although the camera work was an artistic and stylistic choice, it was more of a film student's assignment rather than a director's work. I think the character of Pintel was better written in this one. I also felt that the actors playing Pintel and Hercule were a little too exaggerated for the part. However, this does not detract from the overall production. The film begins with some fairly unnecessary humor, then some interesting music, and the rest of the movie is really solid and dramatic. I enjoyed it very much. I'm giving it an 8.
Angela
Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 19:46

I actually like this film better than The Shining. However, The Shining is a much better film. This film is a mixture of different genres, but the greatest thing about it is that it combines a good story with some good actors and it has a great score. I love that it shows both sides of the law and that it shows the heavy hand of the Catholic church. I also love the story of how they try to teach a child about the law and how he is actually taught about it from his evil stepfather. It was great to see some real British actors and really good for it. The only problem is that the film can get a little boring sometimes, but it's worth seeing, I just think that this film will be better enjoyed by people who are familiar with the tale.
Christian Gardner
Saturday, 27 Jun 2020 07:06

One of the most ambitious productions of the 1970s, but also one of the most controversial. With its bold and stunning cinematography, the film draws upon a rich tapestry of colour and light, and a sense of quiet beauty, which makes the film a truly great piece of work. However, the production was plagued by a lack of proper direction and an awkward narrative. Director Richard Eyre seemed to lack the confidence to create a coherent narrative. The film's first half is slow, dragging with no real action. This, coupled with the slow pace of the second half, makes the film a bit unwatchable. The second half, however, is far more interesting and is more coherent. The story is rather cliche, but at least it is a bit original. The film is certainly worth a look for its great cinematography, but it is far from the classic of its time.
Randy
Thursday, 25 Jun 2020 23:04

Well, how about that. Shakespeare, his full-blown plays, the world that he created, his characters, his interpretation of the rules of the game, his characters' plight and their triumph, and the end. Just a few of the things that could be said about the play. I can't do it justice by simply talking about the meaning of the play. One of the things I most admire about this film is how it takes what could be a drab Shakespearean tragedy and shows us the truth of human nature. In that respect, it's a work of art. Another thing I most admire is how the film has chosen not to show how Shakespeare died. I'm not saying that Shakespeare died in an honorable way. He did die. It's just that the film chooses to leave that part out. Instead, we are treated to scenes of King Henry going about his routine of war and invasions. There's no scene of him dealing with his grieving wife or mother-in-law. We are shown scenes of him making things up as he goes along, and we are told the result of that. A nice touch is that the scene of Henry's speech at the beginning of the play is not shown. We are just given the scene of Henry having been crowned King of England and what is he doing. The next day, Henry is dead. The film shows the death scene, but it does not show how the deaths of many of Shakespeare's characters are going to end. This is especially true for Hamlet and the Duke of York. We are not told how these characters die, only how they die. I liked that. It gave a sense of uncertainty, of things going to hell, of the tragedy of life, of the absurdity of war, of the corruption of nobility, of the corruption of kings. And it allowed us to be present with the events of the war as they unfold. It didn't show the king being killed, but we were there. It was the war that was the story, not the king. And the main difference between Shakespeare and the rest of us is that the story is told from the viewpoint of the people who are to be the heroes. No king or queen is left out. It is not a portrait of a king or queen. It is a story of the people who go about in the world with their own fears and desires, their own interests, and their own aims. These are the people who become the people we all are. The play's greatest strength is that it shows us what a true person is. That's a good thing. It gives us a real look at the characters, not only their personal lives, but also their actions and their motives. It is the fullest statement that the character can make, which makes it all the more meaningful. Shakespeare knew what a great work of art this was, and I think that he knew that he was to be used and that he was to be used. He knew that when he died, it was only a matter of time before his work would be used. Shakespeare was a man who lived on through his life, and his work lived on through him. He had created something that could live on through him. He knew how much he had to leave in the world for us to see, and he did. If only his contemporaries had had that same idea of how to be good, if only they had a little more wisdom. We would be a better people.
Louis Brown
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 21:50

A very well made film, and I had a difficult time deciding what was going on. Not because I wasn't able to see the film, but because I couldn't figure out what was going on, or what I was watching. As soon as the film ended, I was able to place it into the correct context. No. I did. I was able to see what I was watching, and understand what I was watching. I was able to see the past. It was like a map. I'm not a very strong storyteller, but I was able to follow it, and understand what it was that was happening. I'm also not very good with filming. It was a challenge for me. I wasn't able to focus on what I wanted to focus on. I couldn't focus on what I wanted to focus on, or what I was watching. But, it was a very good film, and I recommend it.
Ashley
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 04:44

The film is well done, a lot of attention is put into the story, the actors do a fine job, the movie is well made, but it seems to be a little overblown. I don't really see the point in having a great battle, unless you're a history buff. Also, the fight scenes are overblown. I think it would have been more effective to have a real battle, instead of using actors. All in all, it is a good movie, but not as good as it could have been.
Kathy
Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 01:08

Spoilers herein. Two centuries ago King Duncan was (in the eyes of his people) murdered by his own family for their own selfish gain. Now, in this remarkable adaptation of Shakespeare's sonnet, you can clearly see the sinister man behind the mask - and the beautiful statue of a giant head is what really made the story come to life. Duncan, being a proud man of action, tries to stop his sister and her beloved son from marrying to another noble man and then assassinating him. In doing so, he causes his own family's disgrace and the King's downfall. But Duncan's ruthless ambition is shattered, the true purpose of his life hidden, and he is brought down from his throne by the tragedy that befalls his family and the King's. Yet, he is restored to his throne by the death of his son, leaving his kingdom to be ruled by his sister's son. The tale becomes an allegory about vengeance and redemption, showing the grandeur of the King and his people's nobility in a time of turmoil and depravity. The acting is very good, with the two main characters, Duncan and the Queen, holding their own in their roles. Each character has a large role in the story, and each character is very well played. I especially liked Cate Blanchett's portrayal of Duncan. His murderous nature is shown in his jealousy of the Queen and his feelings of jealousy for her son. Yet, his good intentions, and the way he tries to redeem himself from his own self-destructive motives, are revealed as the story goes on. In the end, the story is not completely up to snuff, and at times, there are some elements that don't make sense (for example, Duncan is murdered, yet he doesn't even know his son, or the Queen's obsession with an expensive painting). Yet, the story is wonderful, with fantastic acting and cinematography. Overall, this is a wonderful film, and I recommend it to all people who are into Shakespeare.
Gerald W.
Saturday, 13 Jun 2020 02:56

This movie can be a bit hard to watch. You are on the edge of your seat the whole time. For some people, this is one of their first time watching a Shakespeare adaptation and it's going to be the hardest one to watch for a long time. The whole storyline is very complicated and it's hard to follow. The way the movie is told in English is so slow and easy to understand. Some of the characters are hard to understand at times and the lines are pretty hard to understand. There is a lot of information in the film. The movie is really long. The first hour and a half of the movie is pretty long and slow. When it's over, you are in a different place and it is a totally different movie. Some people will say it is a disaster. I don't really think it is a disaster. The performances were good. Keanu Reeves was amazing as the young king. Juliette Binoche was a pretty good choice as Queen Margery. Ralph Fiennes was amazing as the King of England. He really played a major role in the story. However, there was a couple of performances that were kind of cheesy. I didn't really think they were that bad. Also, the movie is pretty depressing. I found it hard to watch at times and I found myself wanting to leave. The movie also has some of the most brutal executions I have ever seen. I also found it pretty gruesome and graphic. Overall, I think this is a great movie. It's not Shakespeare, but it's a very good movie and it's hard to watch at times. I would recommend this movie to people who love Shakespeare and want to watch a good adaptation. It's not Shakespeare, but it's a very good movie. Overall Rating: 8/10.
Nancy
Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 04:43

Even if you don't think this movie is good, you have to admit it's entertaining. There's a story line in here that will make you feel good, and is a good time. The cast is pretty good. Rufus Sewell is the kind of villain I love, he has the charisma and the sadism to pull it off. The film is actually a flashback of his past, so there is a lot of backstory to it. The film is a little slow at times, but it is overall entertaining. I recommend this film to everyone, and I know I would be watching it again. Recommended for a movie night.
Jacob Morrison
Monday, 08 Jun 2020 22:46

I don't see the big deal about this movie. I have seen it a number of times and it's been very entertaining and satisfying to watch. I like the plot, the acting and the music. The camera-work is a little 'ridiculous' at times but it works well. My only regret is that I would have liked to see a little more of Tom Hardy's character. It would have been nice to see how he went on in the war. Overall, I enjoyed the movie and I'm looking forward to seeing it again.
Christina P.
Monday, 01 Jun 2020 02:21

Just saw it. It's a very well-made film, a love story that keeps you engaged. It's an excellent story and I think it's one of the best films I've ever seen. It's also a good love story. I just wish there were more scenes that showed more of Elizabeth. There was a lot of stuff I didn't like, but for the most part, it was great. The acting is very good, especially by the kids and the leading lady. Overall, a very good film.
Howard G.
Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:59

I am happy to have a new favorite film of 2018. My wife and I saw this movie on a Sunday afternoon and it was the perfect movie to watch with the family, at the end of a long, hard week. Not a good film for a young audience. It does deal with a lot of themes. Violence, Religion, Love, Death, and so on. This film does not portray the battle between the Christians and the Muslims, but instead shows the various characters in the war and the human cost of it. The acting was good, the film was very well made and the battle scenes were very well done. I would definitely recommend it. This film was very different from any of the other war films that have come out in recent years. It did not glorify war, nor did it condone it. It was not about the soldiers, but rather the war and the emotions of those involved.
Jeremy Shaw
Monday, 18 May 2020 12:32

Like most of the audience in the theater I saw it in the first week it came out. I am glad I did not pay to see it at the theaters. But the irony of that is that it is a great work of art and yet, when you go to see a film of the Shakespeare cycle, you expect to see Shakespeare. And when you do, you do expect a great deal. I'm not saying that this film doesn't deserve the acclaim it has received, but I am saying that I expected more of it. And I can't say that it is perfect. There are some problems. Some are that it seems to drag a bit and some are that it sometimes seems too much of the story is seen in the first hour of the film. But it is also an interesting story. I don't want to say too much, but I think this is one of the best films of the current generation.
Zachary Sanders
Saturday, 16 May 2020 23:16

the movie "Bohemian Rhapsody" is set in rome around 1623 and follows a group of musicians who want to break into the Roman capital and stop the brutal queen, bohemian roman, from controlling the country. the movie, though long, is very well done. there are great performances, well acted by the main characters, from the two leads, Jonny Greenwood and Helena Bonham Carter, the two actors who play each character have excellent chemistry. the movie also has a beautiful cinematography by Pietro Botti and a beautiful score by Massimo Dallam. the movie shows a historical era in the face of modern times and in an unusual way. it is not an historical film. but a great story. it is a very artistic film and it is a perfect movie for everyone to watch.
Tammy
Friday, 15 May 2020 21:46

First of all, the only reason I read about the movie was because it's directed by Joel Schumacher and was set in Victorian England. What I found most disappointing about the movie was that the film lacks a strong story. The story is simply not there. The second most disappointing thing was that the movie lacked a strong climax. It doesn't have a strong climax that was powerful enough to keep the audience on the edge of their seats. The last disappointing thing about the movie is the actors. I felt like they were playing very stiff roles. They weren't convincing enough to make the audience care about the characters. I also felt that the actors just tried too hard to sound confident and intimidating. The character that I was the most disappointed in was Michael Gambon. He plays his role as a silent narrator. He is simply too over the top. He comes across as over the top. Also, he doesn't have the right amount of emotion to the character. I thought that Tobey Maguire and Martin Freeman were quite good in their roles. I also thought that Morgan Freeman and Ian McShane were good as well. Overall, I didn't like the movie at all. The movie lacks a strong story. I felt that the director was trying to take the story to an extreme. I also thought that the actors were over the top. Also, I felt that the character of Bors was over the top. I really don't like this movie. I would have been much more satisfied with the movie if the director would have just had the character of Bors speak for the entire movie instead of just narrating. Overall, I would say that I would not recommend the movie to anyone. I think that the movie was not strong enough to be good. If you are in the mood for a movie that is just a little different, you may enjoy this movie.
Victoria S.
Wednesday, 13 May 2020 01:04

I haven't read the play of Shakespeare's Hamlet, but I did get the book and I have to say that I really enjoyed this film. While it is not a perfect adaptation, I thought it did a pretty good job of showing the twists and turns of the plot. I don't think that there were any problems with the story in any way, shape or form. I just think that the film was kind of slow and boring at times. The film didn't move along like a good story would. It was kind of dragged out in some scenes and it seemed like the film didn't go anywhere. I guess the biggest problem with the film was the fact that I didn't think that it was very good at all. I don't think that there was anything really outstanding about it. There were some great action scenes and the acting was quite good but overall I think that the film was just OK. I think that the director, Terence Malick, did a good job with the film and I hope that he can keep this up with the next movie of the film.
Christopher Peters
Friday, 08 May 2020 21:30

One of the most disturbing films I've seen in a long time. This film was a lot darker than the book. There were times when I wanted to turn off the film, but I kept on watching. The acting was great. The story was actually quite interesting and the ending was quite good. However, the characters were not as developed as they could have been. The best performance was by the youngest actor, who played King Duncan. However, he didn't have much to do. The other actors were not as good as the young actor. Overall, I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to see a good film with some disturbing elements. The film is worth the watch and I would watch it again.
Jean Richards
Friday, 24 Apr 2020 17:42

I enjoyed this film very much. There are a few moments that are rather cliched, but they are still able to be admired. However, the majority of the film is just pure entertainment. The set pieces are impressive, the actors do very well, and the scenery is stunning. I would not say it is a masterpiece, but it is well worth the time to watch. The film has a more serious and dramatic feel than you would expect, and it can be appreciated by people of all ages.
Heather W.
Friday, 24 Apr 2020 16:37

Peter Jackson's adaptation of Macbeth is among his best work, and I don't think there has ever been a film of this size or scale to compare it to. I think it's probably one of the best things in the entire trilogy. It's arguably the most action-packed of the three, and the best story in the whole series. I think that's why it's so powerful, it's like a fairy tale, you can just watch it on the big screen and never get tired of it. The score is one of the best of the series, and the pacing is perfect, even though it has a slow start. I think the main reason that it's so amazing is that it shows the man's impact on his world, it shows how a ruler could be so cruel and callously, yet he still has a good heart. It shows the darkness that power corrupts, and how those who fall from it, are all doomed. And it shows how they end up fighting for honor and for the honour of the land, because it's all about them. The other reason that it's so powerful is because it's the story of a king who has done some of the worst things in the world, yet he still has a heart. And a soul. It's not just about the power, it's about the lack of power. Because he knows that there are people in the world who can never be free from the legacy he leaves behind. That's why it's so powerful, it shows how the story is about the power. In fact, I think that the two best things about this film is the acting and the direction. Christopher Lambert's performance is so haunting and powerful, and the way he was able to hold it all together, was incredible. I think that, on top of the cast, it's the direction that holds the film together. For me, the director was a big reason why it was so amazing. I don't think that anyone could have made this film better. There are only a few directors who can come close to this one. I think it's no coincidence that he directed both Lord of the Rings and this film, and that's a sign of great talent. The acting is incredible, and the way the story is told is brilliant. I think the greatest thing about this film is the music. The score is fantastic, and it's the main reason that this film is so impressive. I know that's a spoiler, but it's the main reason why I give this film such a high score. It's just one of the best scores I've ever heard, and the way it's executed is also amazing. I think that if this film hadn't had a brilliant score, I wouldn't be so impressed with it, but the score gives it such an amazing edge. And the direction is amazing as well, especially when it comes to the pacing. It's very slow in some parts, but when it moves, it moves really fast. That's why I like it so much, because it's a story of power, and the film should move so fast because it's about the power. Overall, I think this film is so powerful and is one of the best films of the three. I think it's a very dark film, but that's what makes it so powerful. And it's also a very powerful and powerful story, with a great cast, a great directing, and amazing music. I think it's so good, and I hope that people like it, because it's an amazing film, one of the best films of all time.
Sara
Thursday, 23 Apr 2020 04:46

I saw this movie on the big screen for the first time when I was a kid, and I was stunned by the beauty of the film. I have since watched it again many times, and each time I find it a little better. The acting is top notch. The character of King Duncan is very powerful. I thought that the King's character was very convincing, and it made me very emotional when he finally dies. I also thought that the actor playing Duncan was excellent. The costumes and the scenery were very impressive. The story was very good, and the cinematography was very good. I do not think that the film is in any way over-rated. It is a great film, and I recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good film.
Denise H.
Wednesday, 22 Apr 2020 22:49

This movie is a bit of a mess. The characters are either too self-conscious or too shallow. They don't seem to be anything like real people, and their actions make no sense. The plot is incoherent. I love the idea of a warlord like the one in "A Knight's Tale" but this movie doesn't show how they would behave. It's like a movie about a time in history where a warlord ruled a country and is now being tried for war crimes. No one knows if he really was a warlord or not. The only thing that matters is how he died. There is no story, no story line, no plot, no real reason for the warlord to be there. It's like the movie was written in the 1960's, with a lot of love for the genre. If you love war movies, you should like this movie. I do not.
See all 31 reviews
 Write a review