Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Le trou

(14098) 8.5 131 min 1960 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Le trou is a movie starring André Bervil, Jean Keraudy, and Michel Constantin. In prison four long-sentence inmates planning an elaborate escape cautiously induct a new inmate to join in their scheme which leads to distrust and...

Genres
Thriller, Crime, Drama
Director
Jacques Becker
Starring
André Bervil, Jean Keraudy, Philippe Leroy, Michel Constantin

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Thriller, Crime, Drama
Director Jacques Becker
Writer Jacques Becker, José Giovanni, Jean Aurel, José Giovanni, José Giovanni, Jacques Becker
Stars André Bervil, Jean Keraudy, Philippe Leroy, Michel Constantin
Country Italy, France
Also Known As Tunneln, Ana, Hullet, El hueco, Az odú, 穴（1960）, O Buraco, Dziura, L'evasió, Le Trou, La evasión, Hålet, De ontvluchting, Un paso a la libertad, Auk, A Um Passo da Liberdade, The Night Watch, I trypa, To kelli tis prodosias, Hofreh, Rupa, Das Loch, Il buco, Alhofrah, El agujero, The Hole, Tunneli
Runtime 2 h 11 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Just as four cell-mates are about to launch their elaborate escape from a tiny cell, a detainee from a cell-block under repair is transferred in. The four all face certain conviction and long sentences. Does the young new jail-mate have the same incentive and if so, can they trust him?

Download thriller «Le trou»

Blu-ray
16.3 GB
DVD
5.5 GB
Windows
5.6 GB
MacOS
7.45 GB
MKV
5.75 GB
MP4
5.63 GB
H.264
6.2 GB
H.265
5.63 GB
AVI
3.43 GB
MOV
7.02 GB
DivX
7.83 GB

Customers who watched drama «Le trou» also watched

  1. The Bad Batch
    The Bad Batch
  2. First Man Available on Prime
    First Man
  3. Mei hao de yi wai
    Mei hao de yi wai
  4. Storks Available on Prime
    Storks
  5. Hot to Trot
    Hot to Trot
  6. Tyler Perry's Boo 2! A Madea Halloween Available on Prime
    Tyler Perry's Boo 2! A Madea Halloween
  7. Eating You Alive
    Eating You Alive
  8. Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda Available on Prime
    Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda
  9. Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children
    Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children
  10. Gimme Danger Available on Prime
    Gimme Danger
  11. Bad Grandmas
    Bad Grandmas
  12. The Mustang Available on Prime
    The Mustang
  13. Venom
    Venom
  14. Weed the People Available on Prime
    Weed the People
  15. Little Men
    Little Men

20 customer reviews about crime «Le trou»

4.5 out of 5 stars 4.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Johnny Weber
Sunday, 19 Jul 2020 00:12

If there is one movie that will make you think after the end credits have rolled, it is "The Kick". I thought the direction and acting were top notch and would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a great movie. The movie will make you think about everything that is going on in our lives. You'll understand that all your friends and loved ones are someone you really don't want to deal with. The movie shows a lot of information about how to kill your competition, as well as how to control the person who you are going to hurt the most. The message is clear, and the movie will make you want to see it again and again.
Randy Diaz
Friday, 17 Jul 2020 16:45

I would like to talk about the other film that was the inspiration for the crime thriller TOWER. I remember a very short scene in the movie where Dr. Franka Summers (Dakota Fanning) is in the operating room with one of her patients. She is sitting with her boyfriend at the table and then she turns to the camera and says "let me take this." In my memory of the film, the title "Tower" was written on the room's door. So it seemed like a logical choice to me to go with the other film in this era of suspense, thriller, and horror. All the different elements of the films that came out of it are amazing, but the one that resonated with me was "Tower" because it was similar to the beginning of the story that was in "Tower." All the subplots of "Tower" all tie in with each other. The only thing that separates the two films is the story itself. "Tower" is a mystery, the answers are not necessarily in the writing of the book. In "Tower," the characters were defined by the situation they were in, and the camera was in the story. So there is no mystery. In "Tower," there is no character development, so you just have to wait and watch. "Tower" was the catalyst for "Tower," and the book is the catalyst for "Tower." If you watch both films, you'll notice that the story comes out of the camera, and vice versa. You can't really get the feeling that there is a movie to be watched without seeing the film first. The only thing I can say about "Tower" is that it is very different than what I expected. I found the plot to be very interesting, and I think it will make you think, and maybe you'll come up with some interesting theories about it. I think that what people forget is that "Tower" was just a beginning. It was much bigger than what we were expecting. The entire first act of "Tower" is filled with suspense. The scene where the camera starts filming in the hotel room where you see the different characters talk about their families and other personal things is very powerful. But, if you have read the book, you'll see the entire second act of the film, and the reason why it was so powerful. The second act of "Tower" is the most shocking film of the
Brandon Black
Friday, 10 Jul 2020 21:50

With its plot, its violence, its exploitation of children and its counter-culture, The Ten Commandments Of Scum has a lot going for it. The characters are well-drawn and the conflict is well-played. And the story is compelling enough to hold your attention for its length. It's also one of those movies that you can watch over and over again. Of course, its biggest strength is its ending. An ending you might never see coming. In the end, the three brothers are punished for their crimes by having their lands and titles taken away from them. These guys are heroes of the people. They are not villains. The film makes no bones about this. The guilt is not in their names but in their actions. "Oh, are we really that good?" The brothers are not heroes. They are not the bad guys. They are criminals. A far greater crime than making fun of children and making them their victims. That's not their crime, that's their crime. This movie is a warning for everyone. I would never suggest that anyone view this movie. The Ten Commandments Of Scum is a masterpiece that will always remain a classic in the history of cinema. It's a work of art that will remain for ever.
Grace
Thursday, 09 Jul 2020 14:23

When a serial killer is caught, the case goes to the highest court in France. A lawyer takes it up on the side of the police. She argues that it is not a case of the police and her client, but the judge. Then he realizes that the serial killer is the victim of a woman who seems to get sympathy from everybody. She tries to seduce him and when he refuses, she plays the role of the perfect victim for the detective. The film also shows us that when people become one with the police, they sometimes start to become a murderer themselves. The best film by Lucas to date. It is worth watching. I will not spoil the ending but I do recommend you to see this film.
Anthony
Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 04:43

This is a very well made film, and a little unusual. It is an hour and a half of gripping entertainment, but it also does its job of making you think. The story is not only about the mobster, but it is about what makes gangsters and the mafia different. It is also about how you can be a gangster, be a gangster's friend, and still be human. If you have seen this film you have seen it all before. There are movies that have completely different story lines. Like Arnie in Mr. Smith, who is not only a gangster, but also has a softer side to him. There is also the film that has the same title, but with Peter Graves, in which he is a wannabe gangster. But he is trying to become a gangster, he has problems with the mob, but he is still human. The first half is the main focus of the film. It shows you a mix of the man, the mob, and the criminal. As the story progresses you get to see how the man and the mob come together, and how the people in the middle get involved. The second half of the movie is much more focused on the mob, but still a lot of the focus is on the mob's part. This is where the film really gets interesting, as the story takes us into the relationship between the mafia and the mafia's associates, and also the tension between the mafia and the mafia's associates. It's an interesting story. If you like the Mafia then you will like this movie. You are not going to be surprised at the main theme of the film. In some ways it is almost more believable, because of the interaction between the mob and the mob's associates, and because of the different characterizations of the gangster and the mob. This is a very different type of film. I would give this film a 7/10.
Jesse Lawrence
Monday, 29 Jun 2020 22:46

Any day I could read a plot outline for a movie like this. What could have gone wrong? The answer, it seems, is a combination of two things. The first is the writing: I can almost see the difference between it and the other movies in this category. If the script is good, there's not a single piece of dialogue that doesn't seem like it belongs in a good movie. This is true even in the beginning. And the second thing that affects the writing is the dialogue. Each line is telling a story. Instead of putting a new twist in every sentence, the writers have managed to create three short stories, each one a bit shorter than the last. The first one is told in a single scene. The second one starts in the beginning of the movie and goes on for the rest of the movie. And the third one ends the movie. The characters, who are like that of every other movie in this category, do things we've seen before. They don't act as if they know what's going on. They act as if they know what's going on. But in every case, there are some small little scenes that draw you into the story. If you're a reader, you'll be able to make out a great deal of meaning hidden in the story. In this film, all the meaning is in the dialogue. Not the plot, but the dialogue. This makes it a movie that, while it isn't perfect, is pretty good. There are some minor things, but they're not enough to make it not worth watching.
Katherine
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 11:36

Comes at the end of the "Madhouse" and for that alone it deserves its own watch, but this movie is not so good. It contains too many shots that look like they were taken from an old bus stop magazine, scenes with unneeded camera movement. If you're looking for a "Madhouse" or a "Hitchcock" this film is not for you. However if you're looking for a French film with a good story and interesting characters, this is your film.
Joan E.
Friday, 12 Jun 2020 16:41

Joe (Guy Pearce) is a street criminal who has been given a clean slate to start over from scratch with a new woman. He finds a wife (Maria Doyle Kennedy) and daughter (Carrie-Ann Moss) with whom he can live the life he can't quite live in his previous relationship. As Joe makes the transition from dealer to husband and father he begins to find himself drifting further and further from the life he once knew. After the briefest of introductions to the world of New York City, Joe becomes a pawn in a global war between the Mafia and the Mafiosi. The film starts off as the point of view of a bystander and then shifts to that of a detective. From here, we are given a look at the underbelly of the city's underworld. We see how the Mafiosi move into the underbelly and how the mafia has come to prey upon the criminals that live there. We also see how the criminals have fallen under the Mafiosi's rule. The film is pretty gritty and is at its best when it features the mafia and street life. The dialogue is often fantastic and the situations that are presented are always gripping. The film really brings to life the character of Joe. He is a character that we feel every minute of the film. We feel for him and empathize with him. I also really enjoyed the character of Joe's daughter. In this film, the characters and the situations that they are put into are all believable. Not only are the characters believable, but the situations are believable as well. The film manages to be both a gritty and realistic look at the underworld and how it affects the lives of those who live there. It also manages to be both entertaining and entertaining. It's an interesting film that has a lot of meat to it. I have a feeling that people are going to like this film and think that it's a decent film. The problem with most films is that most of the time it doesn't do anything for us. This film manages to be both a shocking look at the underworld and also a movie that keeps us interested. Overall, I give this film a 9/10.
Betty
Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 09:14

When a group of corrupt cops in Russia form an alliance, a woman's identity is discovered. There are many great things to say about 'The Fifth Estate' but the biggest is that it is a brilliant portrayal of the corrupt corrupt cop world and the nature of the public. The strength of the film is that it is not a copy of other films, and that it has enough substance and complexity to make you think about the themes in this film. The film is also set in the early 80's and the era does not use such a similar setting, making this more unique to this viewer. Overall, a great film and worth watching.
Eric
Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 03:17

A gripping action thriller. The story is well handled and provides a good insight into the relationship between a killer and a victim. The great villain is still chilling and creates great tension throughout the film. The story is told through the eyes of a police officer who is on the case. It is a well directed and nicely done thriller that is sure to please fans of the genre. Highly recommended.
Terry S.
Wednesday, 03 Jun 2020 12:49

This is a very interesting film. It is an engrossing story about a young man who is befriended by a British girl during the years that he's been in Paris, and the guy falls in love with her. I really liked this film, and I don't know why I'm not seeing more films like it. It's a great story, which I'm sure you'll find interesting too. I think the director did a good job with the whole story. It's also a nice look at what Paris is like, and how it's such a beautiful place. There's no doubt in my mind that it's a very well made film. It's not the most original story, but it's interesting and well told. I wouldn't go as far to say it's a masterpiece, but it's definitely worth seeing.
Douglas S.
Saturday, 23 May 2020 07:48

Michael Clayton is a new Dutch thriller movie with a more traditional storyline. But the fact is that this movie is still really well made and I don't want to talk about the plot here. So I am going to tell you something: I got this movie as a gift and after watching it, I thought it was better than a lot of other recent Dutch thrillers. The movie starts with a person who gets murdered and then it turns into a real thriller, with suspense, mystery, and great performances from the main characters. I was very impressed with that, but the main problem I had with the movie was that I couldn't see that good performances. And the main character of this movie was not very well developed. The way he's not well developed is very obvious. So I don't really understand why they didn't tell more about him. The main actor of this movie was really good, but he only had one line in the whole movie and it was really long. So I didn't really understand his performance. And so on. But the movie is also really good. The direction was good, and the cinematography was great. So I don't want to go into details about the movie. But I will tell you one thing: the acting was good. And so was the direction. So I'm going to give the movie a 7/10. The movie would be a 10/10 if it had more actors and better direction. And I think they got it right. A big improvement for a good Dutch thriller. Recommended.
Aaron
Friday, 15 May 2020 17:20

Cecil B. DeMented is a figure that many in Hollywood will always be debating on. Some consider him as the "rebellious teenager" of the nineties, others as the "crazy celebrity" of the decade. Still others will say that he was a classic example of a misunderstood artist whose works are too controversial to see the light of day. Others will simply look at his true work, and wonder if there was actually any real talent in all of the works he made, or if he simply got lucky with some of the most famous people in the world. This film is a good argument in favor of the former. He's just another Hollywood teen, a trendsetter, who believed that the fame he had was merely the result of some lucky breaks, and had no idea of the harsh reality that actually existed in his life. In one of his works, he portrays himself as the lucky one, being a multi-millionaire while his beloved older sister suffers from a rare genetic disease that requires lifelong medication. His older sister, who spends her time being the brunt of his past indiscretions and the girl he loves, becomes a constant target of his and his own, and eventually ends up in a mental institution. As he continues to live the same lifestyle, it is gradually revealed that his sister is not a normal person and that her condition is far more serious than he ever realized. In the end, you'll either love the film or hate it. While some of the performances are great, like in "Brokeback Mountain" or "Wedding Crashers", others are really good, like in "Brothers", or "Hotel Rwanda", and I would say this film belongs in the latter group. The film is a fictionalized account of what happened to the genius Cecil B. DeMented when he was a kid, and it plays out like a true story, and shows how a life lived in Hollywood is far more similar to real life than most people would admit. It also shows how Hollywood can be used to serve one's needs, and how sometimes people in Hollywood can end up better off, not so much out of a sense of responsibility or justice, but because they know that they are very lucky to be able to live the life they do. While it is not a movie about Hollywood itself, it is a great movie about how it affects those who try to work within it, and it shows how fame can be a tool to hurt
Elizabeth
Tuesday, 12 May 2020 14:41

Dudley, a former drug dealer from the hood, finds a job in a small town in America. He is a gentle man, the kind you would want to live next door to. But he has just been let go from a job because he is too good at it. The town is fairly closed-minded about drugs. When he finds out that his friend is at the local drug store, he decides to search for the owner, David, a man who has a large part in his son's drug deal. The search takes him to the store, and the result is a difficult confrontation between Dudley and David, whose drug dealers are making some unpleasant business of it. But Dudley's search for a woman who has been with David for a long time gives him a lot of hints about her family. This is a very slow movie, it could have been longer but not really. The movie is really quiet. And a lot of scenes are not interesting. For example, I didn't care much for the ending of the movie. That's not the ending, it's just the end of the story, you don't care. And that's not the right way to end a movie, that's just to drag on and make it hard to get to the end. You could have just ended it and let it drop to nothing and save some of your time. But it just stays that way. You have to be tired or you are overthinking the story. The plot doesn't have much action, but it does have more and more and more. Then you can't really see what is going on. And then you are so tired. So, in the end I didn't care about the movie. There is not much story. There is some action and some suspense, but there is no real story. The main character is really annoying, he is kind of hard to care about. The ending is really depressing and it shows how bad a movie is if there is no ending. In the end I didn't like the movie. But, what I did like was the music, the music was really good. I think it is important to have music in your movie. If it's not interesting and there is nothing new or different, you should not use music, but you should have music. If you have music in your movie, you have something going for you. Music does not make the movie better, just more interesting. The movie doesn't have that. I gave this movie a
Denise Patterson
Monday, 11 May 2020 19:07

A rather strange film with a rather bizarre, yet intriguing plot. This film is about a prostitute who hooks up with a crime boss in order to steal money from him. While this does not quite work out, it is a rather interesting story with a rather good plot. For the most part the film is great fun. This film is very much one of those films you would watch with friends. It has it's funny parts and has some really funny moments and some very good one liners. The acting isn't the greatest, but it is good. One of the best parts about the film is the setting. It is a dark, dirty, depressing place. While it is all the same, it doesn't detract from the film. I would recommend this film to any fans of crime movies. 7/10
Matthew S.
Monday, 20 Apr 2020 01:48

Some of you may be saying, "how can you have a hard-boiled detective going after bad guys after not one single crime has been committed in the entire movie?" Well, the hard-boiled detective here is Ronald, played by Mike Leigh. This film is all about hard-boiled detectives and the way they go about the job. What happens to the bad guy that we've come to hate in these kind of movies? Well, he goes to prison. He may be smart, or he may be just plain dumb, but he does go to prison. You can almost guess who he's going to go for. And what does the movie say about prison? Nothing. What is the connection? You just know what the movie is going to say, and you know that everything is going to be pretty predictable, but you know that nothing is going to be over-the-top. It's nice to have a film that doesn't take itself too seriously, and it doesn't give the audience anything they haven't already seen in a movie before. It's just what you've seen in movies before, but it's new to film. Mike Leigh's portrayal of Ronald doesn't make him seem like a nutty guy. He's a cool detective who likes being cool, and he does the right things, and he does them as if he doesn't care. He doesn't let his personality get in the way of his work. He just gets the job done, and he does it pretty well. This is a pretty good film. But it is still not a great film. Some of the stuff we've seen before. I know I've seen it before. It's been done better, and it's been done better in other movies. The guy who played Ronald was a better actor than Mike Leigh. He was more believable. And the thing that kept me from giving this movie an 8 or a 9 is that I really liked Danny Glover's performance as a bad guy in this movie, but I don't think he was very well played. It was hard to identify with him, and I didn't feel like I was watching a good actor, I was just watching a bad actor. The movie is just good for the first 40 or 50 minutes or so, but then it goes downhill. It's not until it's too late that we get any kind of closure on the characters. The way that the main characters are presented to us is pretty much the same. It
Deborah
Monday, 20 Apr 2020 01:10

I enjoyed this movie as much as I enjoyed the original "The Thin Red Line". There was a lot of good acting in it too. I also enjoyed the detail in the environments. I felt like the production value was pretty good too. I was surprised at how the movie was shot. I think a lot of people overlook the fact that the director of "The Thin Red Line" was also the person who was in charge of directing this film. I hope they continue to be involved in future productions and show the directors what they did.
Lawrence K.
Monday, 20 Apr 2020 00:05

I thought this movie was really good. It was very well done. I do not like the ending because I do not like a happy ending. However, the director did a great job of making the ending to end with a sort of hope. I give it a 7 out of 10.
Brian Marshall
Sunday, 19 Apr 2020 22:47

The title is given to a story where cops arrest a bunch of people that they want to clear the streets of. However, they are expecting a large crowd of innocent people. There are several kinds of people who will be affected by the various actions that they might take. For example, it's not like the plot is totally black and white. It's also not the case that the cops are in a very good position. They are aware that they have an opportunity to collect a great sum of money, but they will do nothing about it. On the other hand, the defendants are the innocent ones. This means that they are victims of the police and they are obliged to pay for it. What they will do with it is very much up to the viewer. To summarize the movie, it's a movie about the individual responsibility of a group of people. A character named Ted is a cop and he has a father, who's not very happy with his son's decisions. In addition, his son is a troubled individual. The people who get arrested include a group of women, a man, and a gay man. The movie ends with the arrest of Ted's father and his conviction. To sum it all up, I think that it's a movie that's worth seeing.
Phillip
Sunday, 19 Apr 2020 22:09

The main protagonist in this film, Édouard Jugnot, is a great individual in his own right. An impressive architect, Jugnot is on the brink of achieving his ambition: become a government official. However, his ambition is in conflict with the will of the people. It is a matter of principle, not ideology, that pushes Jugnot to his ultimate limit. He has become aware of the magnitude of the crisis that is looming in his country, and his passions rise to the surface. As the film opens, we are given a glimpse of the conflict between the citizens and the government, as a large group of protestors storm the city hall, demanding change from the government. Some citizens are killed, and the government has to scramble to ensure that it won't be the end of the revolution. Jugnot is on the brink of making the ultimate sacrifice. He decides to sacrifice himself, before he becomes an old man. This decision is a courageous one, and one that he doesn't seem to regret. The film is constructed in a great way, which gives the viewer a sense of urgency to the story. There is a palpable sense of danger in the atmosphere, with great police cars patrolling the streets. The director does a great job of conveying the crisis to the audience, and he does so by using bold angles, great camera work and careful, stylish lighting. This is not a film to watch for casual viewers, but it is definitely one of the better films that the French cinema has produced in recent years. The acting is great, and the soundtrack is also memorable. The film is well shot, and makes an interesting, captivating narrative. It is a very powerful film, and I recommend it to anyone.
See all 20 reviews
 Write a review