Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver The Man Who Knew Infinity

The Man Who Knew Infinity is a movie starring Dev Patel, Jeremy Irons, and Malcolm Sinclair. The story of the life and academic career of the pioneer Indian mathematician, Srinivasa Ramanujan, and his friendship with his mentor,...

Genres
Drama, Biography
Director
Matt Brown
Starring
Raghuvir Joshi, Dev Patel, Jeremy Irons, Malcolm Sinclair

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres Drama, Biography
Director Matt Brown
Writer Matt Brown, Robert Kanigel, Matt Brown
Stars Raghuvir Joshi, Dev Patel, Jeremy Irons, Malcolm Sinclair
Country USA, UK
Also Known As Mees, kes teadis, mis on lõpmatus, Sonsuzluk Teorisi, Čovek koji je video beskonačnost, Omul care a cunoscut infinitul, L'Homme qui défiait l'infini, Muž, který poznal nekonečno, Az ember, aki ismerte a végtelent, 天才無限家, O Homem que viu o Infinito, O Homem Que Viu o Infinito, 奇蹟がくれた数式, L'uomo che vide l'infinito, Moz, ki je poznal neskoncnost, Die Poesie des Unendlichen, Covjek koji je spoznao beskonacnost, Człowiek, który poznał nieskonczoność, Ο άνθρωπος που γνώριζε το άπειρο, Ha'ish she'yada eynsof, El hombre que conocía el infinito
Runtime 1 h 48 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description In the 1910s, Srinivasa Ramanujan is a man of boundless intelligence that even the abject poverty of his home in Madras, India, cannot crush. Eventually, his stellar intelligence in mathematics and his boundless confidence in both attract the attention of the noted British mathematics professor, G.H. Hardy, who invites him to further develop his computations at Trinity College at Cambridge. Forced to leave his young wife, Janaki, behind, Ramanujan finds himself in a land where both his largely intuitive mathematical theories and his cultural values run headlong into both the stringent academic requirements of his school and mentor and the prejudiced realities of a Britain heading into World War One. Facing this with a family back home determined to keep him from his wife and his own declining health, Ramanujan joins with Hardy in a mutual struggle that would define Ramanujan as one of India's greatest modern scholars who broke more than one barrier in his worlds.

Top reviews

Friday, 10 Jul 2020 04:46

I will start off by saying that this is a great movie. This movie is well written and filmed, but is far from perfect. There are some parts in the film that I will disagree with. First, the viewer is initially introduced to a certain friend of the protagonist that was a rapist and murderer. This friend, who has a brother named "Cid", was introduced to by the protagonist. This brother, who also happens to be a scientist in his spare time, was shown as a very innocent and very naïve person. The reason for this is that, the protagonist was in the Navy, and actually, he was the son of a naval officer. Now, I will agree with you, that the way the story of the story was told could have been better, but it is an improvement over the previous parts in the movie. Also, the ending is quite weird. I don't know if I would ever see this movie again, but it is a great movie. The acting, as I have said, is great. I was really impressed with Robert Downey Jr, especially the part with the kid who tried to seduce the protagonist. Also, I thought that the kids were great, they were very well done. I have always admired the acting of Matthew McConaughey, but he actually gave a good performance in this movie. There are some parts in the movie where it is just very plain, but I don't think it is necessary to make the movie boring. I was really impressed with the cinematography and the editing, but I would have liked to see a bit more, I don't know, that was why I didn't give it a perfect score. Overall, I really enjoyed this movie, but it could have been better. I have to agree with all the reviews that the movie is very short. I don't know what the length of the movie was, but it was short, and I didn't think it was necessary to have such a short movie. It was a great movie, but I would not recommend it to anyone.
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 00:19

Like many people, I really like the idea of the "secret history of the universe" film. It's a fun way to spend an evening. It's also a fun way to kill an hour and a half. I have to say, however, that I did find the film a bit slow at times. There's a lot of explaining going on, and I think that it takes a while for the film to get going. In addition, I think that there's a few things that could have been done a bit better. For example, there's a point in the film where the characters are told that the truth of the universe is going to be revealed to them. The truth of the universe has been revealed in the previous film, so that's it. The other thing is the character of the nun. I thought that she was pretty annoying. The nun is supposed to be a sympathetic character, but I think that she is just plain annoying. I don't think that it's appropriate to have a nun in a film that's supposed to be set in the future. I also thought that the nun wasn't that convincing. In addition, I thought that the story of the nun was a little too complicated and I didn't buy it. Another thing that I think could have been done a bit better was the plot. I think that it would have been much more interesting to have the story be based on the love between the nun and the guy. It was hinted at in the beginning of the film that the nun was willing to kill her daughter if she had to save the man she loves. However, the story then seems to go into a very bizarre direction, which is never really explained. In addition, there's a point in the film where the nun is trying to kill her lover, and he has no choice but to let the nun kill him. The nun doesn't have any remorse for her actions, and then the film ends with the nun saying that she just wants her daughter to be happy. I just don't think that that's a good enough explanation of what is happening, and I think that I would have been more interested if I had been given more information. The film had some very good effects, especially the ones on the planet Venus. I also liked the way that the film ended. It was very romantic, and I really liked the way that the film ended. I think that the film is good, and I think that it's worth watching, but it's definitely not a film that I would recommend to anyone.
Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 21:57

I watched this film a couple of years back, as a nice finale to my long running interest in Werner Herzog. There is a lot of interesting things going on in the film, but not a lot of power. The subject is of great interest to anyone who has any interest in the subject, and to anyone who likes to study the history of art and art movements. But this is not an interesting film, and, with the exception of Herzog's "The Passion of the Christ", it is one of the most lifeless and boring of all the Werner Herzog films. This film is an example of a "life after death" film, and it is one of the best examples of the genre. The film is about a Jewish artist, who after a stroke, his wife leaves him and he is left alone in his home. He learns that he has a long and very unusual life ahead of him, and that there is no way back. He moves to Paris, where his friends and family are all from the same country. He works as an assistant to a friend of his, and he becomes acquainted with a Jew who is trying to raise money to build a museum in Paris. The story begins to unravel as he has to take care of his friend, and in the end he must confront the truth about his life. The cast of this film is outstanding. The casting of Paul Mazursky as the Jewish artist was genius. The whole cast of "Das Experiment" is very good. I thought that Laurence Olivier was the best in the film. The music is very well done, and I thought that the score was quite good. But the story is not very good. The story is not interesting and very thin. I did not like the ending, because it was very fast. It is a short film, and it needs to be longer. The story of this film is not very good. The plot does not go in any direction that you want it to go. I also do not like the style of the film. The style of this film is good, but it is not very good. I do not think that the style is very good. The film is over 2 hours long, and it is not very long. It is a very very slow film. I like a lot of Werner Herzog films, but this is not one of them.
Saturday, 09 May 2020 18:35

A young artist, Jimi, aka the one-time Superbowl-winning quarterback, Steve Young, who becomes fascinated with the work of Michaelangelo. Jimi soon develops an interest in painting and a desire to acquire the secret knowledge of the artist and the ancient secrets of a powerful drug called cactus, which was developed to heal cancer. He becomes a prolific and talented artist and seizes the opportunity to be the first student in the life-altering experiment, which was to take place in Rio De Janeiro. As the artist learns more about the secret of the drug, he begins to unravel the mysteries of the human mind and the nature of reality and the art, thus taking away his immortality. This is a well-made film, but I found it to be a bit too heavy-handed. I didn't find the exposition to be needed and it was hard to understand what the point was. There were too many questions that went unanswered, and I found myself not being invested in the film. The story was also predictable. There are too many characters who are given too much screen time to develop. The film is long at 2 hours and 40 minutes and it takes too long to get to the point. I felt it was better served by having more sequences. The acting is superb. Gary Sinise and Kevin Spacey are the best of the supporting actors. Kevin Spacey's performance is more than adequate, but Gary Sinise does an excellent job in his role as the scientist who is trying to get Young to participate in the experiment. Gary Sinise is the best thing about this film. The only minor flaws are the light-saber fights in the film and the overlong film. I also found the acting to be a bit over-the-top. I found myself laughing at the actors' antics. This is a very good film, but I feel that it could have been much better.


Write a review