Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Black Mother

From red light districts to lush rain-forests, 'Black Mother' is a loving and lyrical ode to Jamaica and its people, a visual poem that is at once deeply felt love letter and ecstatic street-corner prayer.

Genres
Documentary
Director
Khalik Allah

All Systems Operational


Top reviews

Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 09:57

The problem with the movie was that it is all about one mother trying to handle a family. The mother in question, Lynne Poulson, does not want to be in the spotlight, but does not want to make a fool of herself or her daughter. There is a significant amount of material that needs to be presented to her that is not presented, however. One scene that needs to be presented is her confrontation with the man who is the father of the two children, not because of the movie's title, but because of her reaction. This is a mother who wants to have her own children, but has to deal with a couple of idiots who are apparently unfit to be parents. She refuses to let them be a burden on her, as they seem to be, and goes on about being a great parent. That scene is quite moving, and it is in the only scene that is not also an interview. It was also the only scene I felt was important to show to Lynne Poulson. There are other scenes that are not very useful to the story of Lynne Poulson's life. The most important one is the one with the wife. She is the most important character in the movie, and it is not because of her husband, but because of her. It is a heartbreaking scene, and the reason why Lynne Poulson's life is interesting. She is the most important woman in the movie. But she is also the most important character in the movie. We see her get sick and get out of the hospital, and then go to work. We see her taking care of her daughter. She is also the main character of the story, and the first and last person you see in the movie. This is the second biggest problem with the movie. There are too many scenes that could have been cut out. One is her son's fight with a very angry child. It is a very sad scene, and it could have been cut out and could have made more sense. The other scene is where she goes out with a man who thinks he is a father. This is another difficult scene to explain. But I think that would be too harsh. It is just a little bit too sad, and it is not in the movie at all. The movie is just a little bit too sad to be worth the time to see it.
Monday, 13 Jul 2020 07:36

This is an excellent documentary by a young filmmaker, but the title is misleading, as the subject matter is nothing but the routine aspects of 'adoption', including the process and the adoption agencies' practices. The film is more a study of a woman's struggle, a journey of self-discovery. The film's title was an attempt to convey the narrative of a middle-class black American woman whose life has been changed by an adoption agency. The title is not the title of the film, and the film is far more complex than that. The title reflects a desire to convey the main theme of the film, and to put the viewer in the middle of the story. The film is more a study of the woman, rather than of the agency. Although, I feel, the film could have been more extended to include some interviews with the adopted children, or some more personal views from the woman. The film is divided into the main story, and the many side-stories. The main story is a woman's search for the identity of her biological child. She meets people, and explores their beliefs and motivations, and tries to come to terms with her life and her situation. This is not only a story of a woman's quest for identity. She is also trying to decide whether she is a good person or not, and what she is going to do with her life. I am convinced that this film is extremely informative and has some very profound ideas, but it is still incomplete. It would have been much better if the film were to be longer, so that it could have been a more complete piece. The film focuses on the woman's life, but does not include some of her family members or other individuals in her life. This is a mistake. By including her family, we would be missing something important. The film would be better if it had interviewed people who knew her, and not her family. The film focuses on her identity crisis, and it is important to have the conversations that the woman was having with her family. This is why the film focuses on her and not her family. However, I have no problem with the fact that she had many questions. There were many occasions when I thought to myself, "What is going on with her?", or "Why do they keep talking about this?", or "Why do they keep talking about this?". Although I wanted more information, it is important to know the inner-workings of the family. The director did not show any interviews with her family members. We know that her father is very prejudiced, and his daughter is very happy with her biological father, but we do not know what they are talking about. If this was not the case, I would have liked to have seen some of the family's views on the situation. We are only shown the man, but we are not told about his wife or son. We are never told what they are thinking, and we are left to infer what they were thinking from their actions and words. This is a major flaw in the film. The main story does not have enough substance to carry a full length film, but the side-stories are very interesting. The most interesting part of the film is when the woman is talking to her adopted sister about the adoption agency's practices. She was shocked to find out that she was adopted as a child, but also amazed to find out that the adoption agency would not tell her that her biological father
Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 23:00

In the aftermath of the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was a great deal of public discussion and controversy about what we now know as Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It seems that this documentary, which is based on three weeks of research, is a reasonable introduction to the history of these events. The film opens with an interview with the late Richard Rhodes, who was a respected professor of history at Oxford University. Rhodes was a famous historian who spent his life on the European continent studying history of the Middle East. His views on the history of European civilization seemed to me to be very compelling. Here, he describes his research into the history of the Japanese Occupation of China during the war. He describes a historical and cultural environment in which resistance to the occupation was often intense, but also demonstrated a wide range of values and attitudes towards the culture of their occupiers. Rhodes thought that this study was crucial to understanding the "national character" of the Chinese people. After reading this, I was interested to learn that Rhodes did not have the complete story. It seems that some historical events were omitted from the documentary. In this case, it appears that there was some dispute over the chronology of the invasion. Rhodes described how his research started in China, but that he was unable to get information about the Japanese occupation of China before the war. He then reported that his research eventually revealed that the Japanese occupied China from 1937 to 1945. It is hard to believe that this research was not completely successful. It is clear that Rhodes' work, as well as his views on Chinese culture, were influential in shaping the thinking of the Chinese people about their history. When the documentary finishes, I found myself interested in knowing more about this fascinating subject. In this documentary, Rhodes also discusses his views on modern China. Although I believe that he had an interesting perspective, his opinion about modern China was somewhat different than what I had expected. He reported that modern China has the most complex society of any country, with a diversity of political and religious systems. He also noted that China's economy has grown, but the expansion has been so rapid that the Chinese people have not had a chance to catch up with their standard of living. The documentary was highly informative, and I was interested to learn about the subject of modern China.
Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 10:19

In the 1970s and 80s, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had a program known as "Mother's Day", where they tried to encourage people to get involved with their families. Unfortunately, this program was a failure. As you can see in the film, people who participated in this program reported that it didn't do much to make a difference. Since it was simply a program to encourage the participating mothers to go to work and have a family, it was not aimed at any measurable effect. Most of the programs were too small to have a significant impact. Still, the program is interesting because it's just plain bad. The one aspect that the program didn't do was motivate the participating mothers to have children. But, that's a small portion of the program. One of the participants, Barbara Jordan, recalls her father, Henry Jordan, telling her that he would not have any more children if she didn't go to work and have a family. So, he sent her away to work at the local branch of Sears and started a family, Barbara says. In fact, there's no evidence that there was a meaningful effect from the program. There is a claim that the program created the need for women to have children, but that claim is weak. The mothers in the program were not motivated to have children. There was no evidence that they were in a better position to have children. Barbara remembers her mother, who had worked hard, never had children, and was a single mother. This mother was not motivated to have children, and her work hours were not greater than what she would have if she had stayed at home. Overall, the program was a failure and should be taken out of the program and the history of the program should be edited out. The program should be used as a good example of what could have been done, not the case study of a failed program.
Tuesday, 12 May 2020 15:29

The basic premise of the documentary is very compelling. While it is a hard sell to preach a message from the pulpit, one cannot but respect the man. He is an outstanding example of how God's grace can change a man. We hear from friends and colleagues of the young man and his family and the people who were friends with him. These people tell us that his health, life, and marriage were impacted by this experience. We also hear from a few of the people who were affected by the blast. The documentary shows some of the effects of the blast, which include the loss of the older man's parents, the lack of transportation for the younger man to the hospital, and the temporary loss of communication with the older man. One of the people who suffered the most was the younger man's wife. She suffered severe injuries and even a broken arm. She is working hard to recover. She said that this experience has made her an even stronger person, and she now takes care of her two small children. There are some who are left asking "What did God do to this poor boy?" This documentary answers that question. He was just a child when the bomb went off, and now he is a man who has devoted his life to serving others and helping those who need his help. We hear about the boy's ministry, his ministry ministry, and the ministry of the young man's congregation. I think we can all say "thank you" to the man for his life and ministry. It is amazing to see his strength in spite of the damage he suffered. I wish that he was able to witness his ministry to others and to help others. If there is one man that I could pray for, it is him.
Sunday, 12 Apr 2020 18:55

The title of this documentary, "The Mother of All Black Mothers," is apt. In this film, the director, Malcom X, discusses the life and work of his late wife, Eva, and the impact of the police on her life and death. It is an incredibly emotional film. You will not be able to turn away from the screen. However, if you are not familiar with the events of Eva's life, you may find yourself feeling lost. You may even think you know what happened, but the film makes it clear that it was a complex story, and that it is difficult to follow. I have not read Eva's autobiography, but it was the title of the film that gave me the impression that Eva was a "black mother." This is not the case. Eva was an African American who was married to a white man and had three children with him. She was a mother, not a black mother. The children were her children, not her. The children were born to a white father and a black mother. This was not a black-white issue. Eva's life was not a black-white issue. The film does not give the full story of Eva's life, but it does give a sense of the complexity of her life. Eva was an exceptional woman, and the film does not show her as a black woman. It shows her as an African American woman, and that is the most important part of the film. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to know more about the life and legacy of Eva X. I also would recommend it to anyone who is interested in African American women, because Eva's life is an example of the power of a woman's work and her impact on her children.


Write a review