Disclaimer: This site does not store any files on its server.

Ver Mary Queen of Scots

(33907) 6.3 124 min 2018 Subtitles and Closed Captions

Mary Queen of Scots is a movie starring Saoirse Ronan, Margot Robbie, and Jack Lowden. Mary Stuart's (Saoirse Ronan's) attempt to overthrow her cousin Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie), Queen of England, finds her condemned to years of...

Genres
History, Biography, Drama
Director
Josie Rourke
Starring
Jack Lowden, Margot Robbie, Joe Alwyn, Saoirse Ronan

All Systems Operational

Product details

Genres History, Biography, Drama
Director Josie Rourke
Writer Beau Willimon, John Guy
Stars Jack Lowden, Margot Robbie, Joe Alwyn, Saoirse Ronan
Country UK, USA
Also Known As Két királynő, ふたりの女王　メアリーとエリザベス, Maria regina di Scozia, María, reina de Escocia, Marija Kraljica Skotske, Maria Stuart, Königin von Schottland, Μαίρη, Η Βασίλισσα της Σκοτίας, İskoçya Kraliçesi Mary, Marija Stjuart kraljica Škotske, Duas Rainhas, Mariam Stiuarti Shotlandiis Dedofali, Marija, Skotijas karaliene, Marie Stuart: Reine d'Écosse, Maria Stuart, dronning af Skotland, Mary Malkat ha'Scottim, Marie Stuart, Reine d'Écosse, Las dos reinas, Maria, królowa Szkotów, Mary, Queen Of Scots, Marija Skotska, Marie reine d'Écosse, Marija, Škotijos karaliene, Kaksi kuningatarta, Maria, Rainha dos Escoceses, 雙后傳, Mary regina Scoţiei, Mary, Queen of Scots, Mary, šotlaste kuninganna
Runtime 2 h 4 min
Audio Português  English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles Português  日本語  Čeština  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Description Mary Stuart's (Saoirse Ronan's) attempt to overthrow her cousin Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie), Queen of England, finds her condemned to years of imprisonment before facing execution.

Download history «Mary Queen of Scots»

Blu-ray
16.23 GB
DVD
5.43 GB
Windows
5.53 GB
MacOS
7.38 GB
MKV
5.68 GB
MP4
5.56 GB
H.264
6.13 GB
H.265
5.56 GB
AVI
3.36 GB
MOV
6.95 GB
DivX
7.76 GB

Customers who watched drama «Mary Queen of Scots» also watched

  1. Disobedience
    Disobedience
  2. El Jeremías Available on Prime
    El Jeremías
  3. The Messenger
    The Messenger
  4. Gongjak Available on Prime
    Gongjak
  5. From Nowhere
    From Nowhere
  6. Avant qu'on explose Available on Prime
    Avant qu'on explose
  7. War for the Planet of the Apes
    War for the Planet of the Apes
  8. 100 Acres of Hell Available on Prime
    100 Acres of Hell
  9. A Bread Factory, Part One
    A Bread Factory, Part One
  10. The Peanuts Movie Available on Prime
    The Peanuts Movie
  11. Alpha
    Alpha
  12. Chevalier Available on Prime
    Chevalier
  13. Ism
    Ism
  14. Marjorie Prime Available on Prime
    Marjorie Prime
  15. Little Italy
    Little Italy

33 customer reviews about biography «Mary Queen of Scots»

3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Janice S.
Monday, 06 Jul 2020 21:47

This movie was a good movie, but it was nothing that I would consider to be historical. And some of the history was only made up as they went along. I was really pleased with the acting in this movie. There were some good performances in this movie, and I really liked the movie. I also thought the movie was more than the synopsis that it gave me, because I really wanted to see it as I found it interesting and fascinating. So overall I really liked this movie, and I think it's worth watching.
Christina O.
Tuesday, 30 Jun 2020 02:52

This is a very good historical movie. The movie is interesting and more accurately portrays the events that took place during the 17th century in Britain. The movie was well filmed and there were some very dramatic scenes that kept me on the edge of my seat. The movie was a lot better than I had expected. I felt that the movie was an accurate representation of the events that took place during the reign of Queen Anne Boleyn. The movie was also entertaining and exciting. The movie is not the most dramatic movie, but it is still a good story. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone.
Gary W.
Tuesday, 23 Jun 2020 09:16

I enjoyed this film, not as much as I thought I would. I wasn't expecting to like it as much as I did. It's not a movie that I would pay to see, but I did enjoy it, and I think that the actors and actresses did a good job. It's a good story, and it does a good job of showing the British and the American history, which is the best of the three. I think that the fact that this film doesn't have a lot of special effects, that it does have a lot of history, and that it does have a lot of drama and emotion, is the reason that I didn't like it as much as I thought I would. The film is a bit slow, and it's a bit long, and I think that it would have been better to have had more action in it. I do think that it was a good movie, but it's not one that I would pay to see.
Andrea G.
Tuesday, 23 Jun 2020 07:49

The BBC's American version of the play, portraying a cynical Edward I, has been given a run of the mill production. There is no real sense of horror or even of any foreboding. It is more a bit of a joke, set in a time that has passed. The cast is made up of mainly relatively unknown actors, with such names as Colm Meaney, Christopher Eccleston, David Hemmings, M. Emmet Walsh, Derek Jacobi, the wonderful Patrick Stewart, and Michael Gambon, who plays Sir Walter Raleigh. As a matter of fact, there are even some British actors in the cast: Sheridan Smith, the great great great great actor of the Victorian era, in a small role as the general. The scenes depicting the siege of Agincourt are very good. The costume, the scenery, the music, the scenery and the way the story is told are very good. But that is it. The characters are all stereotypes. The husband, of course, is the unprincipled Edward. The best character in the movie, however, is King Henry, played by Christopher Eccleston. His scenes are very good and very moving. We understand him, as the English people did, and he is much more sympathetic than the other characters. The famous Sir Walter Raleigh is also good, although he is almost an afterthought in the movie. His scenes are the best. I am sorry to say, that the rest of the cast does not really add much to the movie. I would have liked to see more of Sir John Mills, Sir John Gammon, Sir William Cecil and Sir Robert Cecil. All of them have a more significant part than the characters in the play. They are all quite good, even though they are minor characters in the movie. In conclusion, I would say that this is not the best American version of the play, but it is good entertainment. It is worth seeing, even if you have seen the original.
Kenneth B.
Monday, 22 Jun 2020 00:31

It seems as if many people on here seem to have failed to grasp this movie, as it is a very straightforward depiction of a real-life event, which may have happened, which does not necessarily have to be true. That's the thing about Shakespeare. He was a poet, a dramatist and a novelist. This movie doesn't touch on Shakespeare's play or his genius, but rather does his life story and what happened to him. This movie is a fascinating and interesting look at a controversial event, which can be seen as either a tragedy or a tragedy for the times. The movie was well done, the story was well told, the acting was excellent, the setting and production were great. It's a very good movie and I recommend it.
Danielle
Sunday, 21 Jun 2020 18:34

This is a beautiful story that draws the viewer in to the story by many angles. It is very powerful. There is a lot of violence, and some nudity, but I enjoyed it very much. I love that I could see the bigots and the courage of the common folk, and how they had to fight to survive. The depiction of the Spanish Inquisition is very accurate. Some people didn't like the portrayal of the Inquisition, but that is a completely different story. Overall, this is a beautiful story, with beautiful performances and directing. It is well worth watching. 8/10
Ryan
Saturday, 20 Jun 2020 11:15

I loved this movie and I just want to say I loved the part where they took the great sword they had in the movie and made it into a full length movie. The scene where they had the sword was so beautiful, it was like the scenes from "The Lord of the Rings" and the way the sword came back to the hero, it was so beautiful. It also showed how one of the greatswords was made. I loved how they showed the journey the greatsword went through from being turned into a full length movie to the tip of the tip of the tip of the sword in one scene. I also thought they did a great job of showing how the greatsword and the sword of Lys were turned into greatswords. I also thought the actors did a wonderful job with their roles. I thought Kevin Costner did an excellent job of showing his acting skills, I also thought that they did a great job of showing the time of the events that took place in the movie. Overall I thought this movie was great and I would recommend it to anyone, and I would also recommend seeing this movie. I will give this movie an 8/10.
Steven
Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 18:51

I am not too familiar with the story, so I had no idea what to expect from this movie. My daughter and I enjoyed this movie very much, it was very suspenseful and kept us on the edge of our seats the whole time. It was not predictable, and left us with many questions. The acting was very good, and the overall story was great. The story was well told and the music was very appropriate. If you liked the movie I would definitely recommend it. A great family film that I would recommend to all.
Sandra
Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 04:05

What a performance of the best actress in the world. Patricia Clarkson was on fire in this film. This film was also very good. I can't say anything bad about it. I loved the whole picture. It was just an amazing story. I love my friend who watched the movie. He said it was very good. He loved the scene with her and the wedding. All the colors and the costumes. The whole thing was perfect. The costumes were very beautiful. But I think that they were better than other movie made in recent years. Great film. I am going to buy it for my collection.
Douglas Duncan
Thursday, 11 Jun 2020 07:23

In this version of the great play of Shakespeare's "Henry VI Part 1", actor-director Christopher Nolan takes us on a journey through Henry's life from his childhood in England, through his love of music, his journey to the court of Henry VIII (played by an Oscar winning Heath Ledger), through his rule of England, and finally his ultimate downfall as Henry VI, King of England. While the movie's artistic style is spectacular and captures the film's tone of melancholy, there are a few plot holes and flaws that I can't help but notice. I think it would have been more interesting to have cast an actor that actually had some experience playing a role as well as a director that had some experience directing. And of course the film would have been more interesting with a director who had a knack for story-telling. The movie focuses more on the true events and nothing else. The movie follows Henry through his childhood and his love for music. While the movie's version of the play is very well made, it does leave the audience wondering how the film makers have achieved a rich and detailed film on Shakespeare's work. This could have been a much more rewarding experience if they had played the story in a way that made more sense and was more accurate. And the movie focuses too much on the true events. While there is still some truth to the story, the movie gets too much into showing us the finer details and the scenes that were real. In the end, while the movie is not as good as the play, it is still an interesting and interesting movie that will keep you engaged and entertained.
Matthew Castro
Sunday, 07 Jun 2020 04:32

Although this movie was made for TV it was a much more effective film than the typical movie that the studios make for TV. The acting was superb and the acting in general was very good. The movie was very well done and it was very entertaining. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes a good story. I would also recommend this movie to anyone who likes to see a good historical film.
Denise S.
Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 01:44

This is an extremely well done historical drama with a cast of top British actors. I personally find it very enjoyable. The plot is interesting and the pace of the film is just right. I also enjoyed the historical accuracy in the film. In particular I was happy to see how they made their historical mistakes. Although it is historical fiction, I feel the film is clearly put together to be as accurate as possible. It is an important historical film that I recommend to anyone who wants a great historical movie with an enjoyable story and nice acting. It is a long film but it is well worth the viewing. My grade: 8/10
Cheryl T.
Friday, 05 Jun 2020 19:47

The fifth in a series of BBC adaptations of historical dramas, this film shows us the scale of King John's invasion of England. Although the acting is rather wooden and the plot thin, it is still quite an entertaining film to watch. The setting is gorgeous, as is the cinematography. The ending is somewhat shocking, but I think it is because the point of view is so much different from the historical one. The acting is good, as is the cast. You will find the love scenes to be quite realistic, and some of the battles are very exciting. Overall I would say that this is a great movie to watch for the history lovers. 8/10
Lauren Obrien
Thursday, 04 Jun 2020 13:47

I was interested to watch this film after seeing the praise given to it by the BBC. However I was disappointed. The acting was good but it was not enough to carry the film. It was not a biography. It was more of a biopic. The film was too long and I did not like the fact that the film did not go into detail as to how Elizabeth was brought up. I would have liked to have seen more of the characters, particularly of Edward and Catherine of Aragon. I found it difficult to believe that Edward was such a devout Catholic. The film had a strong focus on the Catholic side of the story, which I found hard to swallow. I was not sure what the point of the film was. I was also very disappointed with the fact that it was very difficult to watch the film without feeling a little sad. I found it difficult to watch the film without thinking about Elizabeth and how she was treated. I did not think the film was very good. I think it could have been better. It could have been more entertaining. However it was still good. It was a good film to watch, and I would recommend it to anyone who liked the film 'Elizabeth' or who was interested in the historical story of Elizabeth I.
Samuel
Tuesday, 02 Jun 2020 23:05

The English court of Henry II was scandalized by the accusations made by a nurse, Lady Jane Grey, against Henry VIII. In response to this, Henry had a private council in late 1533 and appointed Sir Walter Raleigh to investigate Jane's actions. Raleigh used his own two hands to search Jane's private files and concluded that she was guilty of some legal misdemeanors. This resulted in her being stripped of her title and her husband and their two children were placed in an increasingly difficult situation. As a result of her actions, the queen had her nephew, Henry Stafford, killed and his entire family disinherited. During his investigation, Raleigh discovered that Jane Grey had been imprisoned by the king in the Tower of London and that her mother, Elizabeth, was pregnant with her illegitimate child. At the same time, Henry was learning that Jane had been removed from the country to Richmond Castle, Gloucester, with her family. The queen would ultimately name her "Queen of Scots" and, as a result of her treachery, she would become one of the most hated women in history. This film is based on historical facts about the events surrounding Jane's accusation. It is a great film, though, and worth seeing for all of the great performances.
Albert Hill
Sunday, 31 May 2020 09:38

I have been a big fan of King Arthur for as long as I can remember. I have seen a lot of movies about him, and I think that I have seen the best ones. This movie is not one of them. The story is very weak and not convincing. The acting was also quite bad. It is a pity because it could have been a good movie, but it is not. So, I recommend that you don't waste your time on this movie. It is a pity, because I had hoped for a good movie. I will not give it a 1 star, because it is not a bad movie. It is just not a good one.
Brittany
Thursday, 28 May 2020 23:22

It's been a while since I've seen the film of Andrew Jackson and so I didn't know what to expect of this version. But I have to say that I thought the film was great. The film was well made and the acting from all the cast was great. My favorite actor, Renee Zellweger, did an excellent job as Queen Elizabeth. The only person who didn't do a good job was Jack O'Connell. I think he didn't have the necessary strength to be an actor, and I think it was the way that he was put into the film that led to that. I have to say that I don't think that he was right for the role, although he did the best that he could have. His son, however, Matthew McConaughey did a great job as the young Jackson. I think that his portrayal of Jackson was well done, and he was the one that was believable. I think that some people are overlooking the performance of the actor who played Jackson. I think that the performance of Nathan Phillips as the young Jackson was good as well. He was believable in his performance. I think that many people should watch the film to see what Jack O'Connell's performance was like. It wasn't the best that he could have done, but he did a good job. My only disappointment was that I thought that the film was a bit too long. The film should have been a little shorter. Overall, I think that this is a great film, and I think that it should be seen by people who like historical films.
Angela Jimenez
Thursday, 28 May 2020 17:34

I read reviews that said this movie was bad and I wondered if I was missing something. But what I discovered was that the movie is just as bad as a lot of critics said. What I loved about it was the fact that I was not getting bored with the movie. The actors did a great job. I am not a huge fan of Jackson, but his part was good. There was no character development, but it was okay. I liked the way the movie portrayed the British Royal family. But the problem I have with this movie is that I found it to be boring. I felt like I was watching a movie that I had already seen a hundred times, but this movie did not keep my interest. The ending was predictable and was too much of a turn around. I also didn't like how they changed the story at the end. The only good thing about this movie was the acting. I give this movie a 7 out of 10. I also did not like that they showed the women in the movie and I didn't like how the story was changed at the end. But overall I enjoyed the movie and I believe that everyone should see it. I give this movie a 8/10.
Russell H.
Wednesday, 20 May 2020 15:12

So long ago, as I remember, we had a magnificent leader who was able to make Britain great again. By that I mean her ability to lead a nation to the height of economic, social, and military strength and prosperity. My father was a youth in the 1940s, I have great admiration for the magnificence of the world's first great economic powerhouse. I also have a great admiration for the world-class military that made the war effort possible. In my mind, the Brits came close to the glory of Britain and America. It was a wonderful time for all of us, with our world-class industries, our beautiful coastlines, our technological advances, our beautiful colors, and our amazing creativity. I thought the films of the 1940s should be restored to life. The films had great potential, with a great script, great direction, great actors, and great sets. I was a great admirer of Michael Curtiz, and he brought this project to fruition. The story of the Little Lord Fauntleroy is a true classic, and I am very glad to see it restored to its glory. I hope that more films about history are brought to the screen. I have seen a few films on the Great War, and I must say that the story was true and that the battles were great. However, I was not able to see the other films that were made about this period. There are some films that are good and some that are not good, and I think that people should be able to view films about the Great War, and especially about the Battle of Britain, without having to be a Brit, and without having to have British accents. I was very pleased with the restoration of the films that were released in the 1980s, and that I was able to see in the 1990s.
Gary
Tuesday, 12 May 2020 12:50

This is the type of movie that a lot of people have been saying to me that they enjoyed but that they didn't want to see again. I did not want to see it again. I was disappointed with it. I'm not a historian, but it seemed like the story was left out. The King was always more important than the queen, and that made me not want to see the queen even if she was "the best of all." I was bored to death.
Victoria Moreno
Friday, 08 May 2020 14:37

I will try to keep it short. I think this is a good movie, with some good fight scenes. It is a good film and well worth seeing. The historical accuracy is pretty good. If you are interested in movies about the War of Independence, you will like this movie. If you are interested in the English King and the Parliament, you will not like this movie. My wife did not like it either, but I think she liked it because she enjoyed the history. I think this is a good film, and I hope you enjoy it as well.
Alice W.
Monday, 04 May 2020 10:28

I saw this movie today and I can't believe I didn't see it sooner. I am not sure why it took so long for it to get a wide release. I am not familiar with the historical characters, but it seems that the makers of this movie are experts in their subjects. I will give credit to the movie makers for taking some risks. However, I have to say, the movie was very slow paced, and not as thrilling as the book. It does not hold up as a movie, and I am sure some people will be disappointed. The movie was based on a very poor source. I would have liked to see more footage from the ground. The movie was well filmed, but the movie was not exciting. I think people who have never read the book will be disappointed, but I thought the movie was good. I would recommend it, but I don't think it will get wide distribution. I think the movie could be a good way to introduce people to the subject. I think the movie makers did a good job, and it is a must see movie, but not a must buy movie.
Jesse Bell
Tuesday, 28 Apr 2020 04:45

I loved this film. It's the first time I've seen a film that was more about the way that the king and queen were and how they came to be in power and how they got that power and how they managed to get away with it. I really liked the fact that there was a lot of historical accuracy to the story and how the kings and queens were portrayed. The scenes with them going back and forth were pretty cool. I also really liked how the film was able to show how the kings and queens got to be in power. It was very interesting to see how they got to be in power and how they got away with it. They were able to get away with it because of their looks. They were able to keep the throne for so long and they were able to keep the throne for so long because of their looks. This film was a lot of fun and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in history.
Theresa W.
Tuesday, 28 Apr 2020 03:18

The stage-writing of H.G. Wells' classic novel was a breakthrough for theatre, the now classic 1939 film version of the same was a very successful and very sad attempt at adapting the book. I have read the book several times and I feel it has still not been given justice, though I can understand why the screenwriter didn't have enough background to know how to appropriately adapt the book into a film. This film attempts to do justice to the original story but suffers from lack of information and even more importantly lacks the character development that is so critical for the adaptation of such a complicated work. The actors (from most of the big names) deliver their roles well, with a few exceptions. The movie seems to be trying too hard to be historically accurate, and by not giving the characters enough background and showing their choices rather than explaining their choices and why they were made, the film fails to give any of them a chance for redemption. The film is too dark and depressing for my taste, and it lacks any kind of plot, the only reason I give it an eight out of ten is because it has the best acting of the lot. I highly recommend this film to anyone who has read the book, however I'm sure you will be disappointed by the film because it only succeeds in being boring and depressing.
Larry J.
Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 20:00

Two years ago I saw a theatre production of "Henry V" with actors Tom Hardy and Sienna Miller in the title role. It was not a good adaptation. It didn't have the military action, or the battle scenes that were the heart and soul of the original play. The play has been long forgotten, and this movie, although based on it, is not as strong. This isn't to say that the movie was bad, in fact it was good. The acting was great, the costumes were authentic, and the set designs were amazing. It was filmed in beautiful locations, and with a superbly talented cast. Tom Hardy is one of my favorite actors, and I think that it was great to see him playing a great leader and a good lover. Sienna Miller was not a perfect actress, but she did an excellent job, and I believe that she will be a very successful actress in the future. If you haven't seen the play you will love this movie, and if you have seen the play it will be even better.
Zachary Wells
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 19:14

I can't say I'm too familiar with the Welsh history but this film is a must for the uninitiated. It certainly gives you a very good feel for the time period but I think a little more time was spent on the actual warfare, not just the battles. The film covers the Welsh rebellion, the Welsh civil war and the Highland Girt Wars. The director does a great job of using an interesting cast and the detail in the costumes, weapons and more are stunning. The scene where they drive through the hills and get to the location of the battle is absolutely stunning. I was truly moved and the whole movie is a must for any fan of the Welsh language and history. Excellent film.
Walter
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 12:50

In this movie the Queen of Scotland is portrayed as a rather silly person. She isn't believable in her role as Queen, as it seems to be more of a two-dimensional role, where she is rather harmless in her role. Her relationship with her mother, is also a bit odd, as is the fact that the Queen is shown as a rather weak and feeble personality. Still, this movie does show the Queen of Scotland as the most powerful figure of the 15th century, and that she did lead her country well. It is also interesting to see the Monarch of England being depicted as a rather silly person in this movie. However, I would like to point out that this movie does show the English King Henry VIII as the most powerful figure in the 16th century. He is shown to be the driving force behind the English Civil War, which resulted in the rise of the English monarchy, which lasted from 1641 to 1660.
Deborah Bell
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 12:10

I just came home from seeing this movie and can't believe the bad reviews here. The first time I saw this movie, I was stunned. The movie was full of detail and it kept your attention. The movie didn't drag or feel confusing. This is definitely a movie that will be talked about and discussed for years to come. If you haven't seen it yet, go rent it now. You will not be disappointed.
Bruce S.
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 11:35

I've seen this film twice, and it has to be one of my favourite films of all time. It's the story of Elizabeth I, a woman who was a young girl when she was first married to Edward I, and who was then crowned queen. This film tells the story of her life, and how she changed from a young girl to a queen, and the life of her family. The film is very well-made, the actors all do a wonderful job, and the story is very well-written. The music is also very good, and there are some very beautiful songs. This film is also very well-made, and is very well-made, and well-made.
Randy D.
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 10:42

An entertaining film. Yes, the acting is not Oscar-worthy, but the story is really good. It was interesting to see how the relationship between King Edward and Queen Isabella affected the people of England. The film is a good example of how a great king can be a great man and how a great queen can be a great queen. Edward was a great king, but he was not a great king. He was a great king because he was a great king. Queen Isabella was a great queen, but she was not a great queen. She was a great queen because she was a great queen.
Betty Little
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 09:52

I just finished watching this movie and I am truly impressed. The acting is superb and the characters are well developed. The story is strong and has a good flow. The music is appropriate for the movie and adds to the movie. The use of sound effects are very effective. The movie is not a historical drama. It is a drama about the story of the queen. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes historical dramas, dramas about the queen, or about a drama about the queen. 8/10
Maria
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 09:00

Henry The Fourth: The Adventures of Henry the Fourth is based on the true story of Henry the Fourth, the leader of the most powerful noble family in England, the Plantagenets, who fought against the invading forces of the Moors and led to the famous War of the Roses. The movie is a remake of the 1953 film Henry the Fourth. The movie is a bit slow in parts, but there is a lot to it and I enjoyed it. The movie has a different approach from the original, with different stories about Henry's childhood and the initial years of his life. This movie is not a masterpiece and its not a great adaptation, but it is worth a look. The movie is worth your time and I would recommend this movie to anyone, regardless of age.
Barbara C.
Wednesday, 08 Apr 2020 08:34

I don't understand why so many people hate this movie. I have seen it 3 times now and it has stayed with me. The acting is excellent, the cinematography is stunning and the setting is really well done. This movie is the best historical movie I've seen in years and it's not only because it's based on a true story. It's also a good movie for the whole family, it's not only about the execution of Charles II. The story of Charles II was one of the biggest stories in history and the movie shows how this story was told and how Charles II was portrayed. He was a cruel king who ruled by fear and fear alone. I really recommend this movie to anyone who is looking for a great historical movie to watch.
See all 33 reviews
 Write a review